+- +-


Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Total Members: 48
Latest: watcher
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 16870
Total Topics: 271
Most Online Today: 20
Most Online Ever: 1155
(April 20, 2021, 12:50:06 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 6
Total: 6

Author Topic: Corruption in Government  (Read 48015 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
"Morbidly Rich" is a perfect descriptor, in my book.

Yep, that wealth stolen out of the pockets of we-the-people is quite literally killing this country's middle and lower class. Reasonable, dignified living standards of those classes that do 99.999% of ALL THE WORK has ALWAYS been the only thing that preserves national stability.

This article by Zero Hedge, of all places (gold is where you find it! ;D), clearly shows how destructive this continuous wealth transfer up to the morbidly rich is. Except for the last sentence, where it makes a false equivalence between the real Sanders populist (and the non-populist Democrat Warren) with the 🦀 Trump FAKE populist, the article is prophetic of coming extremely violent upheavals targeting TPTB. The American Fascists 'R' US oligarchs had better pay attention.

"The World Has Gone Mad": Albert Edwards Shows How "Trickle Down" QE 💵🎩😈 Works In One Chart

by Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/07/2019 - 11:52

It's been a year of record equity outflows...   :o

... and yet the S&P 500 is trading at all time highs. How is that possible?    

Perhaps instead of trying to explain or justify it, one should just go with the flow and indeed, Albert Edwards starts off his latest letter by pointing out the obvious: "the world has gone mad." Here's why:

it’s not just equities rising to record highs… Christie’s US recently sold two pairs of late 1990s tortoiseshell sunglasses for $2,750, massively outstripping their $200-300 estimate. The ‘Not-QE4’ liquidity splurge has sent risk assets bananas, so the economic narrative has become one in which the US economy is “robust”. No it isn’t. And labour’s fightback has a recessionary downside.

While the simple answer why equities continue to soar even as investors liquidate their equity exposure is thanks to nearly $4 trillion in buybacks...

... Edwards finds a more apt culprit: "The surge in equity markets has come on the back of the Fed hosing liquidity into the banking system via repos and T-Bill purchases." So is it QE or is it "not QE"? Here is Edwards snarky answer:

Remember this is not QE4, as the Fed has repeatedly assured us. Tell that to the equity market, which is certainly reacting as if it was as it as forges to new all-time highs. We have heard these Fed denials before. Remember Bernanke assured investors that QE was different to monetisation because everybody knew with certainty that the Fed was going to take all the QE back. Well, that worked well, didn't it?

To this all we can add is that "Not QE" is adding between $60 billion and $100 billion in liquidity every month. So, yeah, there's that.

Ok, fine, it is QE, but is that really bad? Well, yes. Here's Edwards:

In my opinion QE is totally discredited. I believe it had only a marginally positive impact on economic growth (mainly by driving exchange rates down, most notably in the eurozone and Japan). But the damage QE did in terms of wealth inequality compounded years of painful income inequality.

Oh, and here is the CEO of the world's biggest hedge fund, Ray Dalio, sounding just like this website in 2009 (and every year after):

money is essentially free for those who have money and creditworthiness, it is essentially unavailable to those who don’t have money and creditworthiness, which contributes to the rising wealth, opportunity, and political gaps. Also contributing to these gaps are the technological advances that investors and the entrepreneurs that I previously mentioned are excited by in the ways I described, and that also replace workers with machines. Because the “trickle-down” process of having money at the top trickle down to workers and others by improving their earnings and creditworthiness is not working, the system of making capitalism work well for most people is broken.

Going back to Edwards, the SocGen strategist notes that "investors are desperate to believe this is a rare mid-cycle pause. The ‘markets’ write the economic narrative so the S&P's surge to all-time highs is prompting commentary that the economy is doing just fine. No it's not." Not surprisingly, Edwards urges readers here to read Ray Dalio's recent comment.

Dalio thinks the world has gone mad and if Christie's recent auction is anything to go by, he is right. The good news: as I show inside, labour is fighting back hard to get its rightful share of national income. The bad news: the fightback has triggered a savage corporate profit margin squeeze that is already severe enough to trigger an investment-led recession.

Here Edwards points to the following chart to demonstrate where in the business cycle corporate profit margins are right now:

Of course, the fact that S&P earnings have been negative Y/Y for the past three quarters, and are expected to drop again in Q4, merely confirms this. It is also why nobody is believing the market at all time highs represents anything besides another massive liquidity injection by the Fed and, of course, continued record buybacks.

Which then brings us to the punchline - in response to Dalio, shouldn't QE have "trickled down" at least a bit? The answer is no, as Edwards shows so vividly in the chart below, and explains: "The proverbial "Jo six-pack" isn't stupid. He/she can fully understand how trickle-down has really worked (see slide below)."

And so, in a world that is once again crushing the middle class, Edwards' conclusion is spot on:

No wonder the US looks poised to elect another populist: Warren 👍, Sanders 👍 or 🦀 Trump ( ) -
what's the difference?


Agelbert NOTE: Maybe the morbidly rich will continue to believe the half truth (pun intended ;D) that they "can always hire half the people to fight (vote against, cheat, abuse, lie to, kill, etc., you get the Jay Gould idea) the other half". That "works" ONLY when the government has the consent of the governed. Otherwise, it does not. We are almost there. If Trump stays in office, we will BE 💥 THERE.

« Last Edit: November 07, 2019, 02:03:06 pm by AGelbert »
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37


+-Recent Topics

Future Earth by AGelbert
March 30, 2022, 12:39:42 pm

Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF by AGelbert
March 29, 2022, 08:20:56 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
March 28, 2022, 01:12:42 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
March 27, 2022, 02:27:28 pm

Heat Pumps by AGelbert
March 26, 2022, 03:54:43 pm

Defending Wildlife by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 02:04:23 pm

The Koch Brothers Exposed! by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 01:26:11 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 12:46:08 pm

Books and Audio Books that may interest you 🧐 by AGelbert
March 24, 2022, 04:28:56 pm

COVID-19 🏴☠️ Pandemic by AGelbert
March 23, 2022, 12:14:36 pm