Renewable Revolution

Quote from: AGelbert on March 03, 2020, 04:01:24 pm

March 3, 2020

Centrists Will Still Be Split on Super Tuesday, Thanks to Mike Bloomberg

WILLIAM RIVERS PITT, TRUTHOUT

Joe Biden's big win in South Carolina -- his first such victory in three presidential attempts -- has his allies in the media celebrating, and his large donors have returned to the fold. But Biden's seeming surge back into relevance faces a daunting test today. That test is Mike Bloomberg.

As the smoke clears, it looks like not so much. Half a billion down, and Bloomberg has American Samoa's electors to show for it. Now a two septuagenarian race.

Bloomberg, finally on the ballot, gets little for his millions
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bloomberg-finally-on-the-ballot-gets-little-for-his-millions/2020/03/03/7a451af8-5d89-11ea-9055-5fa12981bbbf_story.html

I agree that William Rivers Pitt was, as you put it, "not so much" right.

However, the Washington Post is totally wrong. Besides the pesky facts, conveniently ignored by the Washington Post, that Bloomberg's millions got him over 400,000 votes in California AND split up the count in Massachusetts, that clever piece of propaganda by the Washington Post is nothing but a giant distraction from the MAIN REASON (i.e. HURT SANDERS on behalf of BIDEN) that Bloomberg spent all those millions. ANYONE with a shred of honesty would acknowledge, as is evidenced by Bloomberg "dropping out" TODAY, so conveniently BOOSTING BIDEN with an ENDORSEMENT, that Bloomberg's INVESTMENT is paying off handsomely.


The Washington Post can state the truth a significant percentage of the time. They have to do that to keep some credibility among readers. 

However, in that article pretending to mock Bloomberg, they are lying simply because they do not want anyone to notice that Bloomberg. like Buttegieg, Klobuchar AND WARREN, were, and are, all in cahoots with the DNC to stop Sanders on behalf of BIDEN, PERIOD.