+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 48
Latest: watcher
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 16870
Total Topics: 271
Most Online Today: 5
Most Online Ever: 1155
(April 20, 2021, 12:50:06 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 3
Total: 3

Author Topic: Darwin  (Read 16730 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
👨‍🔬 James Tour: The Mystery of the Origin of Life
341,723 views•Mar 18, 2019


Discovery Science
63.7K subscribers

UPDATE: This lecture has obviously hit a nerve. For Prof. Tour's response to his critics, see http://www.jmtour.com/wp-content/uplo.... Tour in his response apologizes for using the word "lying" with regard to Jack Szostak, but he goes on to explain in detail why his substantive criticisms of Szostak's article were correct. To read the criticisms leveled at Tour, see https://stonesnbones.blogspot.com/201....

Dr. Tour is one of the world’s top synthetic organic chemists. He has authored 680 scientific publications and holds more than 120 patents (here is a partial list). In 2014, Thomson Reuters named him one of “The World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds,” and in 2018 Clarivate Analytics recognized him as one of the world’s most highly cited researchers. Tour is also fearless. He joined more than a thousand other scientists in signing the “Scientific Dissent from Darwinism.” More recently, he has become a thorn in the side of the origin of life research community, offering blunt assessments of the current state of origin of life research. Read more on this controversy here: https://evolutionnews.org/2019/05/pro...

Taped at the 2019 Dallas Science and Faith Conference at Park Cities Baptist Church in Dallas sponsored by Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture.

Subscribe for more from Discovery Institute
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCm3i_fqq8dqsV-dTAriv2KA

Check out our other great videos:

At the Heart of Theistic Evolution, an Inescapable Contradiction

Mike Keas: Unbelievable (Playlist)


Human Zoos: America’s Forgotten History of Scientific Racism

============================
The Discovery Science News Channel is the official Youtube channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit https://www.discovery.org/id/
http://www.evolutionnews.org/
http://www.intelligentdesign.org/

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:
Twitter: @discoverycsc
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/discoverycsc/

Visit other Youtube channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
Discovery Institute: https://www.youtube.com/user/Discover...
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer: https://www.youtube.com/user/DrStephe...
The Magician's Twin - CS Lewis & Evolution: https://www.youtube.com/user/cslewisweb
Darwin's Heretic - Alfred Russel Wallce: https://www.youtube.com/user/AlfredRW...
Category Science & Technology
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution






👨‍🔬 James Tour: The Mystery of the Origin of Life
341,723 views•Mar 18, 2019
« Last Edit: December 11, 2020, 02:01:43 pm by AGelbert »
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
The wicked worketh a deceitful work: but to him that soweth righteousness shall be a sure reward. -- Proverbs 11:18
Virology Lectures 2020 #21: Evolution
9,960 views•Apr 18, 2020


Vincent Racaniello
51.5K subscribers

Viral evolution is the change of a viral population in the face of selection pressures . This process occurs faster than in other organisms because viruses produce so many progeny harboring many genome mutations. In this lecture we consider the four main drivers of viral evolution: large numbers of progeny, mutation, selection, and quasispecies effects, and discuss where viruses came from and where they are going.

Agelbert COMMENT: Wonderful. ::) Now people have Darwin Happy Talk Tatoos. What next, a statue to leave offerings to in Vincent's office? Nothing like "objective scientic inquiry", eh, Vincent? The above lecture is so full of evidence free conjecture that only a true believer in the Darwinian Religion would accept the assertions made by Vincent as "facts".

THIS is how complex a cell membrane IS:

WHY doesn't Vincent ever mention those pesky INTERACTOMES? Maybe it is because they don't fit in his "RNA world" pet theory.

THIS is the way Vincent operates:

THIS is what evolution theory true believers like Vincent want YOU to believe happened in prebiotic Earth:

THIS is what Vincent and his co-religionist true believers refuse to do, but MUST DO if they expect anyone with critical thinking skills to take their bold assertions seriously:

Viral mutation is ADAPTATION, not "evolution". Mr. Virologist Vincent cannot seem to tell the difference between those two processes, rather conveniently supporting his claims about "irrefutable evidence of rapid viral evolution". Vincent jumped right in there to assert that viruses "evolve faster than anything else out there, from bacteria to cows", RIGHT? Well, if that is true, how come you cannot show evidence of a virus becoming a bacterium? THAT would be EVOLUTION. But gee, these viruses that "Darwin would love because they evolve so fast", that have been around practically forever, even giving the dinosaurs herpes (that was a good one, Vincent),  just can't seem to "EVOLVE" into anything ELSE but a VIRUS!

Finally, please fact check Vincent's ASSUMPTIONS (START AT: 1:07:20 for several, one after another, evidence free leaps of protein synthesis logic, leaving out how those sugars needed for capsid glycoproteins were "randomly" synthesized) about the synthesis of the pre-virus molecules by viewing the video referenced in the graphics I just posted. Vincent provides NO explanation for the "evolution" of the first RNA Reverse Transcriptase molecule. Perhaps he rushed through that FUNDAMENTALLY IMPORTANT PROCESS (if that does not happen, nothing happens) because, understanding how factorial math IMPOSSIBLE it is for that to occur randomly, AND remain stable for a long enough time to proceed to the next step, he just does not want to talk about it.

Then he glosses over the "random" synthesis of other incredibly complex molecules, indispensable for the existence of a virus, (i.e. structural ENZYMES), as if they just popped randomly into the "RNA world" primordial soup. NO FACTS, just CONJECTURE dressed up as, 'WE THINK' "facts".

Notice the, "WE CAN SEE THE ACQUISITION OF CAPSID PROTEINS"  CONJECTURE. Hello, Vincent. WHY don't you spend some time explaining to your students that CAPSID PROTEINS, even in the T1 arrangement, all must be chiral IN THE SAME WAY and all must be folded, from the primary to quaternary structure, IDENTICALLY for them to self assemble into a capsid? YOU did not do that because you KNOW that only a Ribosome and a Chaperonin, neither of which existed in the prebiotic Earth, can DO THAT. Yes, friends, it cannot happen randomly because of the factorial math, something that Vincent avoids like the COVID--19 plague unless he wants to talk up viral mutation "evolutionary" diversity.

Listen closely to Vincent in the above happy talk, fact free pitch about the synthesis of the first virus as he says, in a KEY part of that process, "We don't know how that happened". No kidding, Vincent. You sure DON'T. Until you adequately explain, through Darwinian Theory RANDOM processes, HOW THAT HAPPPENED, you cannot assert, with any objective scientific credibility, that it happened "randomly". YET, we have to take your FAITH that SEVERAL sine qua non processes needed for viral particle evolution  "just happpened" as "FACT"?

YOU are the one that said "you do not care for beliefs, just facts". If it is good for goose, it is good for the scientist gander, Vincent. Below, please find,  some Darwinian Primordial Soup to add to your "evolution soup to nuts" theatrics. It's less embarrasingly ignorant than the "evolution" of Homo sapiens graphic timeline as "evidence" that viruses will "do better than humans". Yeah, right...
« Last Edit: January 27, 2022, 02:36:47 pm by AGelbert »
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Fossil Evidence for Human Evolution: Hype or Good Science? (Science Uprising Bonus Interview)


9,235 views Oct 26, 2021

Discovery Science 130K subscribers

In this bonus interview released as part of the Science Uprising series, geologist Casey Luskin discusses fact and fiction when it comes to fossils that are said to support the evolution of humans from ape-like ancestors. What is media hype, and what is good science? What about specific fossils like Ardi, Lucy, and Homo naledi?

Be sure to visit Dr. Luskin's website at https://caseyluskin.com/ for more of this thoughts.

Be sure to visit https://scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books.
============================
The Discovery Science News Channel is the official Youtube channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit https://www.discovery.org/id/
http://www.evolutionnews.org/
http://www.intelligentdesign.org/

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:
Twitter: @discoverycsc
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/discoverycsc/

Visit other Youtube channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
Discovery Institute: https://www.youtube.com/user/DiscoveryInstitute
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer: https://www.youtube.com/user/DrStephenMeyer
The Magician's Twin - CS Lewis & Evolution: https://www.youtube.com/user/cslewisweb
Darwin's Heretic - Alfred Russel Wallace: https://www.youtube.com/user/AlfredRWallaceID

Agelbert COMMENT: 👍 Excellent question and answer session! I would only add that the (pro-evolution) bone and skull fossil teams of scientists hire artists to draw the NOSES on what they think a given skull (often only a fragment, not a full skull) "should" 😉 look like. 😠

IOW, when they want the skull to look more "human", they tell the artist to draw a sharper, smaller nose. When they want it to look more apelike, they tell the artist to draw a flatter, wider and bigger nose. Both approaches are, not only irresponsibly unscientiifc, but deliberately fraudulent.

What is the evidence for my claim that we are being lied to? It is all about the fossil skull nose shape and size determination (pro-evolution) "procedure". As any forensic scientist that works for the police, with only a skull, to identify a murder victim's face through scientific facial reconstruction will tell you, proper reconstruction of the victim's nose requires intact cartilage. The cartilage is used as the basis for accurately modelling the size and correct shape of the victim's nose. Thus, the police can get a pretty accurate depiction of what the murder victim looked like.

Of course we-the-public are fed plenty of "scientific" happy talk hype about how fossil skull faces are "reconstructed", as this quote from an evidence free article demontrates:
Quote
"Fossils alone may intrigue us, but we still yearn to see "fleshed-out" portraits of our ancient ancestors 🙄. Creating these images takes a wealth of scientific insight 🙄 and a touch of artistic license."
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/humans/riddle/look.html

The above (pro-evolution paradigm) propaganda piece conveniently neglects to mention the nose in facial reconstruction, while busy telling us about other clues (i.e. the gender and the jaw). They just don't want you to notice that glaring issue while making sure you SEE that NOSE their artist draws to make you believe the reconstruction was done "scientifically". In fact, ALL the  artist's conceptions of "early homo", from "human like" apes to "ape like" Neanderthals, that have been disseminated to the public are "artistic license" FRAUDS.

Really? Yes, really. You see, the problem with fossil skulls is that there is no cartilage whatsoever on fossilized bones! That means that all they have to go on is the size of the hole in the skull where the nose cartilage was attached. While that can scientifically help to determine the width and height (but not the shape and length of the protrusion!) of the cartilage, it in no way can be used to accurately determine whether the nose was flat or sharp.

IOW, all those "scientifically determined" artist's conceptions of "homo" fossils and Neanderthal skulls are of no scientific value whatsoever. It is a fraudulent attempt to push their evolotionary paradigm wishful thinking. The mendacious lengths these 😈 pseudo-scientist evolutionary true believers will go to get us to believe their baloney is astounding.😠

Learn more:
👉 Scientific Paper on Facial Reconstruction
Money Quote:
"in fact, facial reconstruction is not easy, because there are many facial variations. particularly according to the nutritional status of the individual and different rates and intensities of aging. Furthermore, the 👉 nose, eye, ear, lips, and chin probably 👉 cannot be constructed exactly from skull characteristics."
http://renewablerevolution.createaforum.com/sound-christian-doctrine/darwin/msg399/#msg399

Read more:
It seems that NEANDERTHAL APPEARANCE is "Evolving". LOL!
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
20,978 views Nov 23, 2021

Gunter Bechly Explains What The Fossil Evidence Really Says


Discovery Science
132K subscribers

In this bonus interview released as part of the Science Uprising series, paleontologist Gunter Bechly unveils the truth behind the fossil record. There are multiple trade secrets among paleontologists. Chief among them is that Darwin's insistence on gradualism was motivated by his understanding that the dramatic jumps found in the fossil record imply intervention. Darwin hoped that time would reveal his desperately needed transitional fossils. It has not, and what science has learned since Darwin's day  would've shattered his hopes as Bechly explains.
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution

Human Evolution Theory Exposed! Destroying Evolution With Their Own Words (Part 1 & 2)


Jan 18, 2022

Young Earth Creation 18.5K subscribers

👉 Join this channel to help promote YEC:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNUG...

👉 Standing For Truth Ministries OFFICIAL Website:
https://standingfortruthministries.com/

👉 Donate to the Show https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...

« Last Edit: January 27, 2022, 04:13:05 pm by AGelbert »
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
The Dinosaur Debate 🤷‍♂️ Is Over❗
Tons of 👨‍🔬🔬 Evidence!



Premiered May 8, 2021

Young Earth Creation 18.6K subscribers

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNUG...
👉Donate to the Show https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
👉Support us on Patreon https://bit.ly/3fmqfwL​
👉Subscribe on Facebook https://bit.ly/35PA6rZ​
👉Our books http://bit.ly/3jkHr7P​ & https://bit.ly/36SbBK0​
👉New Articles posts https://bit.ly/2UMSUSa​
👉Our MERCHANDISE https://bit.ly/35Q39f2​ a one-stop-shop for all Creationists! Shirts, hats, mugs, books, articles & more!

Our goal is to one day do full-time ministry. Your amazing generosity, support, and donations have made us closer than ever to this dream! God bless.

We believe that the Bible is true and can be put to the test for validity. We obviously know that the Bible has parables, allegories, poems, laws, short stories, genealogy, proverbs, sermons, prayers, prophecy, proverbial text, epistles, etc. But most importantly history. What we do is test the history spoken of in the Bible with science and let the evidence speak for itself. We discovered that the evidence is in favor of Creation which just so happens to falsify evolution theory. This is why they know we are a threat and must remove Creation science from the education system at any cost.

Evolution theory is nothing but an attempt to rule out God that mixes truth with lies. Hutton's Book "Theory of the Earth" was published in 1795, it was designed to make the population doubt the Earth was 6,000 years old. Then Lyell's (a lawyer) book "Principles of Geology" published in 1830, was designed to make the population doubt the Flood. Even in his words, it was to "rid the science of Moses". Then in 1859 Darwin's book "Origin of Species" was published which made people doubt Creation. Darwin said He murdered God. He used a step by step process to use secularism as the new religion.
   
Message from Mattman... I once believed in Evolution like most, but after I really began to uncover the evidence all that changed. Now I am here to unveil the deception we were all told was the truth. Let me give you a few examples of how the theory has already been falsified yet remains.

Here is the evolutionary theory in action! Flip-flopping U-turning, Reinventing, and Rescue devices.

*Darwin also predicted evolution as a gradual process known today as Darwinian Gradualism. However many out of place fossils were discovered that falsified this so they invented “punctuated equilibrium” as a rescue device for when evolution speeds up real fast in a time frame that is far too short for gradual evolutionary processes. Then they found that these slow processes can not move at all as they found “living fossils”. So they invented the “stasis” rescue device. They also had a problem when the evidence showed that Darwin's slow natural processes which was called “natura non facit saltus” meaning “nature does not make jumps" were found to make huge jumps. This was named “Saltationism" a complete contradiction. If it goes backward it's called de-evolution, or backward evolution in biology. As you can see, they rescued their fable by inventing new hypotheses and adding them into gradualism. Another perfect example of how and why evolution is not science, but pure unfalsifiable nonsense.

*Back in the 60's evolution predicted that because deep time must be true, living organisms shouldn't share any genetic similarities because deep time would have separated them far too much. Then it was found they share many! So his predictions were removed and now it's used as one of the best pieces of evidence FOR evolution when it's actually a falsification of the theory.

*Dead Worthless Junk DNA became non-coding regulatory DNA. A clever rhetorical strategy they often use: Call it evolutionary junk at first; Then when functions are found, call it the "motor of evolution." Notice their rescued device every time is that they just ASSERT or ASSUME co-option.

* Functionless evolutionary leftover organs become functional organs deemed vestigial organs (lost primary function).

• A Singular Evolutionary tree became a 3 tier domain bush of life = Bacteria, Achaea, Eukarya.

*Mitochondrial clocks; The Observed fast rates from the pedigree method, became the slow phylogenetic assumption method because the clocks were falsifying the deep time theory.

Falsification after falsification happens but gets rescued by getting renamed time and time again everywhere you look. The theory exists to make the population ignorant and not special at all. "I don't want a nation of thinkers. I want a nation of workers". = John D. Rockefeller (Creator of the General Education Board (GEB) started in 1903. Rockefeller funds education to this day.

The evidence is overwhelming for YEC, and even with it being taught to the majority till over 40% of the population knows the Earth is young. This shows their indoctrination and lies have little effect on truth.

He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
The #1 reason evolution is impossible
« Reply #187 on: February 19, 2022, 06:38:06 pm »
The #1 reason evolution is impossible


Living Waters 🕊️ 995K subscribers

There is one fatal flaw in the evolutionary worldview: the second law of thermodynamics. If everything over time gets worse, and not better, evolution is completely false. Ray Comfort expounds this and then talks with college students who believe in evolution and shares the gospel with them.


He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36277
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Dinosaur Soft Tissue Expert | Dr. Mark Armitage
« Reply #188 on: March 22, 2022, 10:59:46 pm »

Young Earth Creation 19.4K subscribers

Dr. Mark Armitage joins Team Standing For Truth for a presentation and discussion on Dinosaur Soft Tissue. Must-Watch!

"Mark H. Armitage earned a BS in Education from Liberty University and an MS in Biology (parasitology), under Richard Lumsden (Ph.D. Rice and Dean of Tulane University’s graduate program) at the Institute for Creation Research in San Diego, CA. He later graduated Ed.S. in Science Education from Liberty University and is a doctoral candidate there.

Mark grew up in a military family and lived in Venezuela and Puerto Rico for 15 years. He became a Christian when he was a college senior, studying plant pathology at the University of Florida, and his family withdrew support from him. 🥺

His experience in the business sector includes Olympus Corporation of America and Carl Zeiss. In 1984 he founded a microscope sales and service company and has been in business for 29 years. He was awarded a US patent for an optical inspection device in 1993.

Mark’s micrographs have appeared on the covers of eleven scientific journals, and he has many technical publications on microscopic phenomena in such journals as American Laboratory, Southern California Academy of Sciences Bulletin, Parasitology Research, Microscopy and Microanalysis, Microscopy Today and Acta Histochemica, among others. His career in teaching at educational institutions includes Master’s College Azusa Pacific University and California State University Northridge.

Mark managed a working electron microscopy laboratory (SEM and TEM) at the Institute for Creation Research in San Diego. In 2003 he moved his laboratory to the Creation Research Society Van Andel Creation Research Center in AZ. His lab is still vibrant and is still producing publications.

Until recently, Mark served as the Manager for the Electron and Confocal Microscopy Suite in the Biology Department at California State University Northridge. Mark was suddenly terminated by the Biology Department when his discovery of soft tissues in Triceratops horn was published in Acta Histochemica. 😠

He is currently seeking relief in a legal action for wrongful termination and religious discrimination by the University.

Mark’s other unique discoveries include the discovery of two new species of trematodes and the reporting of new hosts for several trematodes. He also discovered short half-life radiohalos in clear diamonds and the first-ever discovery of soft tissues inside a Triceratops horn from the Hell Creek Formation in Montana.

He is a lifetime member of the Creation Research Society where he has served on the Board of Directors since 2006. Mark is a member of the Microscopy Society of America, the Southern California Academy of Sciences and the American Society of Parasitologists."
https://creation.com/mark-h-armitage
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

 

+-Recent Topics

Future Earth by AGelbert
March 30, 2022, 12:39:42 pm

Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF by AGelbert
March 29, 2022, 08:20:56 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
March 28, 2022, 01:12:42 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
March 27, 2022, 02:27:28 pm

Heat Pumps by AGelbert
March 26, 2022, 03:54:43 pm

Defending Wildlife by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 02:04:23 pm

The Koch Brothers Exposed! by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 01:26:11 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 12:46:08 pm

Books and Audio Books that may interest you 🧐 by AGelbert
March 24, 2022, 04:28:56 pm

COVID-19 🏴☠️ Pandemic by AGelbert
March 23, 2022, 12:14:36 pm