+- +-


Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Total Members: 54
Latest: abrogard
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 16310
Total Topics: 267
Most Online Today: 2
Most Online Ever: 1155
(April 20, 2021, 12:50:06 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 2
Total: 2

Author Topic: Darwin  (Read 13220 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33117
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Darwin
« Reply #120 on: June 04, 2018, 10:24:23 pm »
AG you are right that I am going to answer your epic post with a short quip.  You can't expect anything else.

Evolution proceeds by a series of random mutations, FOLLOWED BY SELECTION OF THE FITTEST.  So there is total agreement that just random mutation will not do.  It is not clear from any of your accounts of experiments by mathematicians, that THIS version of evolution is what was being tested.  You have an unfortunate habit of describing something, and then in the next paragraph trashing the idea, which makes it very difficult to know what YOU believe.

All scientists should be prepared to have their experiments be judged by other scientists.  But human nature means that reputations may be destroyed in the process, so professors tend to stick to their guns no matter what.  Even Newton was guilty of this.  So Scientific development doesn't always go as smoothly as it should.

When the Christians were beaten by the Darwinists, resulting in no need to have God in the universe at all, the Christians tried to pick holes in Darwinism, many of which Darwin had himself worried about, being a Christian.  Then Creationism was invented to consolidate all that criticism.  It's sole objective was to get God back into the picture, not to explain anything better.

Once again, you make this categorical statement about "how evolution proceeds" as if I had not heard that mantra repeated ad nauseum throughout my college experience. ::)

It is clear that you did not read most of my post. It is clear that you have reading comprehension problems with the part you did read. As usual, you make ad hominem false accusations about me. That is, when you aren't accusing me of being stupid or ignorant, of course.

As to the other blah blah blah about what scientist reputations and so on, see my first sentence. Man, your eternal attempts to position yourself on the podium lecturing the "dumb student" about what he "can expect  from your highness" are absolutely nauseating! Get  a life!

I disagree with everything you just said, especially the ridiculous notion that creationism was "invented" to pick holes in Darwinism. True to atheist form, you have that exactly backwards. Darwinism was what was INVENTED out of bubbly "primordial" Campbell's SOUP 😈 by people like you for the sole purpose of FOOLING people into thinking God is not "in the picture".


It was molecular biology, probability mathematics and DNA research that PICKED THE MASSIVE HOLES in Standard Evolution Theory, Einstein. That was all in the post you cannot challenge except with disparaging ad hominum about "what I can expect". Have a nice day, atheist.
Rob not the poor, because he is poor: neither oppress the afflicted in the gate:
For the Lord will plead their cause, and spoil the soul of those that spoiled them. Pr. 22:22-23


+-Recent Topics

War Provocations and Peace Actions by AGelbert
June 19, 2021, 02:41:00 pm

🚩 Global Climate Chaos ☠️ by AGelbert
June 19, 2021, 02:14:43 pm

Wind Power by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 02:42:48 pm

Science by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 02:31:35 pm

The American Dream by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 02:04:44 pm

Genocide by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 01:15:47 pm

Profiles in Courage by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 12:59:14 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 12:35:18 pm

Plants Which are BOTH Nutritional and Medicinal by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 11:58:27 am

COVID-19 🏴☠️ Pandemic by AGelbert
June 16, 2021, 12:57:36 pm