Renewable Revolution

Scientists try to replicate climate denier findings and fail 

By Suzanne Jacobs  on 26 Aug 2015

SNIPPET:

When we tried to reproduce their model of the lunar and solar influence on the climate, we found that the model only simulated their temperature data reasonably accurately for the 4,000-year period they considered. However, for the 6,000 years’ worth of earlier data they threw out, their model couldn’t reproduce the temperature changes.

The authors argued that their model could be used to forecast future climate changes   , but there’s no reason to trust a model forecast if it can’t accurately reproduce the past. 

http://grist.org/news/scientists-try-to-replicate-climate-denier-findings-and-fail/

The Fossil Fuel Industry Propagandists need to address the FACT that the fossil fuel industry has

1) the MOTIVE (threatened profits from climate change science demanding an end to fossil fuel use)

2) the OPPORTUNITY (privileged access to main streammedia and powerful politicians)

AND
3) the MEANS (billions of dollars from dirty energy profits)

to produce fraudulent scientific papers based on distorted models of climate science that challenge/refute the climate science consensus that fossil fuels are over heating the biosphere.


So, in true Orwellian fashion, they accuse the truly objective climate scientists of doing what the fossil fuel industry has been doing for several decades to defend the fossil fuel industry massive subsidy swag (in comparison to the pittance for Renewable Energy) and dirty energy profits.

As you may observe here, MKing spends no time at all questioning the models that question global warming. He spends no time at all addressing the giant conflict of interest the fossil fuel industry has that inhibits any objective scientific inquiry whatsoever on the question of whether to burn fossil fuels or not.

Oh no, MKing spends most of his time making spurious and defamatory charges about the alleged mens rea involved in climate change science modeling that predicts a hotter biosphere from green house gasses the fossil fuel industry externalizes to we-the-people.

He claims the empirical data is distorted or cherry picked or erroneous or incomplete or whatever to "justify all that money and subsidy swag" for Renewable Energy. It's allegedly a big conspiracy to ruin our quality, comfort and high standard of living that ONLY the burning of fossil fuels can provide. 


Clever, isn't he?
Karl Rove would admire MKing.

Karl Rove strategy #3: Accuse your opponent of your weakness.

http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/index.php/topic,5451.msg83999.html#msg83999