+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 39
Latest: Felipe_solarmining_chile
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 7376
Total Topics: 216
Most Online Today: 2
Most Online Ever: 48
(June 03, 2014, 03:09:30 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 0
Total: 0

Author Topic: Torturing Animals and Claiming it is Science for Our Own Good  (Read 377 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7206
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • View Profile
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
More Openness on Lab Animals 

Dozens of U.K. research groups agree to publicly disclose more information about their animal subjects.


By Kerry Grens | May 15, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, JANET STEPHENS

Pharmaceutical behemoth Bayer used 142,084 animals—primarily mice and rats—for research in 2013. Posting these data online, the firm illustrates where public disclosure is headed in the U.K. in terms of how—and how many—animal subjects are employed in the service of science. Dozens of research organizations in the U.K. this week (May 14) signed an agreement to more openly share information on animal studies.

“For many years, the only ‘information’ or images that the public could access about animal research were provided by organisations opposed to the use of animals in scientific progress,” Wendy Jarrett, the chief executive of Understanding Animal Research and the chair of the working group that developed the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the U.K., said in a statement. Signatories of the Concordat, including professional societies, biomedical companies, and universities, agreed to disclose when, how, and why they use animals in research and to be more open with the public and the media about animal research.   


Animal rights organizations were not appeased by the effort to create more transparency.  Wendy Higgins,    the communications director of the Humane Society International, told the BBC: This Concordat presents a veneer of openness but it’s actually just another platform for obscuring the unpalatable truth about animal experiments.  >:( Michelle Thew,    the chief executive of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, wrote in a blog post at The Huffington Post UK that the Concordat “is simply transparency on their terms with researchers having complete control over what the public gets to see.”  :( >:(

http://www.the-scientist.com//?articles.view/articleNo/39999/title/More-Openness-On-Lab-Animals/
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
Faith,
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
265 Views
Last post December 13, 2014, 12:40:51 pm
by AGelbert
1 Replies
132 Views
Last post December 22, 2013, 06:02:50 pm
by AGelbert
5 Replies
228 Views
Last post January 20, 2016, 11:10:05 pm
by AGelbert
Weird Science

Started by AGelbert « 1 2 ... 5 6 » General Discussion

88 Replies
2362 Views
Last post July 16, 2017, 01:41:23 pm
by AGelbert
8 Replies
257 Views
Last post December 29, 2016, 04:36:11 pm
by AGelbert

+-Recent Topics

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
July 21, 2017, 11:18:34 pm

How Long Ago Were We Created? by AGelbert
July 21, 2017, 01:57:40 pm

Wind Power by AGelbert
July 21, 2017, 12:09:18 pm

Corporate Mendacity and Duplicity by AGelbert
July 20, 2017, 01:49:32 pm

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
July 20, 2017, 12:55:44 pm

Plant Based Products for a Sustainable civilization by AGelbert
July 20, 2017, 12:54:38 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
July 19, 2017, 02:16:34 pm

Corporate Profits over Patient in the Health Care Field by AGelbert
July 18, 2017, 09:25:14 pm

Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Pollution by AGelbert
July 18, 2017, 08:50:35 pm

Non-routine News by AGelbert
July 18, 2017, 07:10:22 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial