+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 39
Latest: Felipe_solarmining_chile
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 7059
Total Topics: 211
Most Online Today: 2
Most Online Ever: 48
(June 03, 2014, 03:09:30 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: Torturing Animals and Claiming it is Science for Our Own Good  (Read 348 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6889
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • View Profile
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
More Openness on Lab Animals 

Dozens of U.K. research groups agree to publicly disclose more information about their animal subjects.


By Kerry Grens | May 15, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, JANET STEPHENS

Pharmaceutical behemoth Bayer used 142,084 animals—primarily mice and rats—for research in 2013. Posting these data online, the firm illustrates where public disclosure is headed in the U.K. in terms of how—and how many—animal subjects are employed in the service of science. Dozens of research organizations in the U.K. this week (May 14) signed an agreement to more openly share information on animal studies.

“For many years, the only ‘information’ or images that the public could access about animal research were provided by organisations opposed to the use of animals in scientific progress,” Wendy Jarrett, the chief executive of Understanding Animal Research and the chair of the working group that developed the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the U.K., said in a statement. Signatories of the Concordat, including professional societies, biomedical companies, and universities, agreed to disclose when, how, and why they use animals in research and to be more open with the public and the media about animal research.   


Animal rights organizations were not appeased by the effort to create more transparency.  Wendy Higgins,    the communications director of the Humane Society International, told the BBC: This Concordat presents a veneer of openness but it’s actually just another platform for obscuring the unpalatable truth about animal experiments.  >:( Michelle Thew,    the chief executive of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, wrote in a blog post at The Huffington Post UK that the Concordat “is simply transparency on their terms with researchers having complete control over what the public gets to see.”  :( >:(

http://www.the-scientist.com//?articles.view/articleNo/39999/title/More-Openness-On-Lab-Animals/
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
Faith,
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
11 Replies
241 Views
Last post December 13, 2014, 12:40:51 pm
by AGelbert
1 Replies
120 Views
Last post December 22, 2013, 06:02:50 pm
by AGelbert
5 Replies
197 Views
Last post January 20, 2016, 11:10:05 pm
by AGelbert
Weird Science

Started by AGelbert « 1 2 ... 5 6 » General Discussion

87 Replies
2333 Views
Last post May 22, 2017, 08:37:59 pm
by AGelbert
8 Replies
239 Views
Last post December 29, 2016, 04:36:11 pm
by AGelbert

+-Recent Topics

Fossil Fuel Skulldugggery by AGelbert
Today at 07:15:05 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
Today at 02:57:06 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
Today at 02:37:38 pm

Computer Software Security by AGelbert
Today at 02:23:48 pm

Wind Power by AGelbert
Today at 02:17:19 pm

Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Pollution by AGelbert
May 25, 2017, 07:16:51 pm

Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) by AGelbert
May 25, 2017, 07:04:33 pm

Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF by AGelbert
May 25, 2017, 03:13:10 pm

Money by AGelbert
May 24, 2017, 07:49:45 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
May 24, 2017, 07:35:05 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial