+- +-


Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Total Members: 38
Latest: Dave Pugner
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 6610
Total Topics: 206
Most Online Today: 2
Most Online Ever: 48
(June 03, 2014, 03:09:30 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden  (Read 3595 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6440
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • View Profile
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
Race is the biggest indicator in the US of whether you live near toxic waste


Written by Zoë Schlanger

March 22, 2017

Go looking for the local landfill or toxic waste treatment facility in any US county with a mostly white population, and you’ll likely find it in the black or Latino neighborhoods. That’s because in the US, your race is the single biggest factor that determines whether you live near a hazardous waste facility.

In 2016, a study published in Environmental Research Letters found “a consistent pattern over a 30-year period of placing hazardous waste facilities in neighborhoods where poor people and people of color live.”

“In fact, places that are already disproportionately populated by minorities, and where their numbers are growing, have the best chances of being selected  ,” Paul Mohai, a professor and the founder of the environmental justice program at the University of Michigan who coauthored the paper, wrote in an email.

The paper followed decades of reports finding much the same: As reported by The Nation, in 1983 the Government Accountability Office found that black people made up the majority of communities near landfills, and a 2007 report, authored by a group of university-affiliated experts in environmental policy and published by the United Church of Christ, found that things had actually gotten worse since the 80s: “[M]any of our communities not only face the same problems they did back then, but now they face new ones because of government cutbacks in enforcement, weakening health protection, and dismantling the environmental justice regulatory apparatus.”

Any remaining environmental justice regulation in the US is likely to be further dismantled in the near future. The Trump administration’s proposed budget for the US Environmental Protection Agency would gut the agency’s environmental justice work by 78%, and likely cut into the EPA’s civil rights office‘s resources, which was set up to handle disparities in geographical distribution of pollution. Mustafa Ali, the head of the environmental justice program at the EPA, has already resigned.

It’s worth pointing out that the EPA’s civil rights office doesn’t exactly have a robust history of reform; the EPA denied 95% of civil rights claims they received since the mid-1990s. When the agency made a formal finding of discrimination on the day before Trump’s inauguration, it was just the second such finding in the office’s history—the first was a preliminary finding in 2011.

Now it appears the federal government will completely take itself out of the business of addressing environmental discrimination.

Living near a hazardous-waste landfill is not just a gross nuisance; it makes you sicker. Air pollution from these sites can lead to a range of health problems.

People of color in the US are also exposed to a 38% higher level of nitrogen dioxide, on average, than white people.
Nitrogen dioxide is pumped out of power plants and exhaust pipes on cars and trucks, and is linked to asthma, bronchitis, and a host of other respiratory problems. And when a power plant emits nitrogen dioxide, it likely also emits sulfur dioxide, another respiratory irritant.

Chronic respiratory diseases make daily life harder and shorten life spans
. Children are especially susceptible; air pollution exposure has been shown to cause cognitive delays in children, and when expecting mothers are subjected to air pollution, it increases their child’s risk for early birth and low birth weight, both of which risk for impaired brain development down the road.
Detroit is a good example for how the racial disparities in pollution exposure play out in America. Much of Detroit’s heavy industry—steel making, oil refining, and coal-fired power plantsis clustered in the majority-black neighborhoods in the southwest part of the city. In 2011, Mohai mapped Detroit’s public schools over air pollution data. He found 82% of black students went to schools in the most polluted parts of the city, while 44% of white students did. And the children in those pollution-exposed schools scored lower on standardized tests.


Agelbert NOTE: Only a racist, privileged, clueless moron (e.g. a Trumper) would be surprised at the above, ESPECIALLY the irrefutable Mens Rea involved in selecting the LOCATION of past (and future) hazardous waste dumps and toxic industry infrastructure by BIGOTED Town council zoning boards ALL OVER THE USA.

The Trumpers would then immediately react, OF COURSE, by calling it "Soros backed fake news".  ::)
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.


Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
2 Replies
Last post August 15, 2014, 01:57:09 pm
by AGelbert

+-Recent Topics

How Long Ago Were We Created? by AGelbert
March 25, 2017, 09:44:35 pm

Weird Science by AGelbert
March 25, 2017, 09:30:56 pm

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
March 25, 2017, 08:12:16 pm

Pollution by AGelbert
March 25, 2017, 03:48:48 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
March 25, 2017, 03:09:00 pm

Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Pollution by AGelbert
March 24, 2017, 09:40:43 pm

Fossil Fuel Skulldugggery by AGelbert
March 24, 2017, 09:02:51 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
March 24, 2017, 08:45:54 pm

Special Sensory Perception by AGelbert
March 24, 2017, 07:01:25 pm

Wind Power by AGelbert
March 24, 2017, 05:48:18 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial