+- +-


Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Total Members: 54
Latest: abrogard
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 16309
Total Topics: 267
Most Online Today: 2
Most Online Ever: 1155
(April 20, 2021, 12:50:06 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: Corruption in Government  (Read 40525 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 33116
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Corruption in Government
« Reply #765 on: November 03, 2018, 02:57:43 pm »
Agelbert NOTE: Apologies to actual canines everywhere. Canines can hear at frequencies that most humans have difficulty hearing, if they can hear them at all, as this video demonstrates (the last sound in the video is an appropriate 🦀 Trump 😈 Dog Whistle auditory metaphor). 


Bought and paid for (by American Fascist Oligarch(s)💵 🎩 🍌 ) Politicians 😈 know they cannot honestly campaign on the issues that voters support.

So, they often use code speech to rally hate filled and racist indiviuals who would not otherwise be suckered into voting against their interests. This vile, underhanded appeal to the basest of human tribal instincts is often missed by people of good will.

Because mostly the targeted (racist) suckers are motivated by it, AND the politician SCUM using it can Orwellianly claim he (or she) is not engaging in racist hate speech , this heinous technique's message, hidden, in disingenuously innocuous words and phrases, for the express purpose of motivating ignorant racists to vote against their economic interests (on behalf of fascist oligarchs ), is called a "Dog Whistle".

The emotional appeal of the political "Dog Whistle" prevents people from thinking logically. It triggers fear of the other, even if not acting on that "fear" is as statistically likely to cause actual harm as the probability of being hit by a lightning strike in your basement (when your house doesn't have one). That's why it works so effectively to con many working class white people to continue to vote to be further asset stripped and conned out of their rights and freedoms by the fascist bastards.

In the following interview, you will learn more about the history of this technique, which was originated and used, mostly by Republican Party, using cold blooded, empathy deficit disordered, careful, deliberate and methodical malice aforethought (mens rea). Trump is not the first devious Republican bastard to use this technique, but he, and the Fascist Republican Party of Profit over People and Planet, is the one that now uses it routinely.


How Trumpís Racist Campaigning Serves ĎRule by the Richí

November 2, 2018

Unveiling a racist, anti-immigrant ad just days ahead of the midterms, Donald Trump is making unprecedented use of a decades-old ďdog whistleĒ political strategy that demonizes people of color in the service of policies that benefit ďrule by the rich,Ē says UC Berkeley law professor and author Ian Haney Lůpez

AARON MATE: Itís The Real News. Iím Aaron Mate.

A spate of white supremacist terror has not slowed President Trumpís embrace of racism, xenophobia, and nativism. Instead, just days before the midterms it appears to be his main campaign strategy. On Wednesday, Trump shared a racist anti-immigrant advertisement on his Twitter page, along with the message ďVote Republican now.Ē The ad features a Mexican man who was convicted of killing two police officers in California earlier this year.

Louis Bracamontes, the Mexican immigrant shown here, was deported twice under Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. The ad also shows unidentified crowds riding and pushing down barriers in unidentified locations. It has been described as one of the most racist political ads in the U.S. in decades. But it is not an exception. The 2018 midterm campaign has seen a number of racist ads, particularly targeting candidates of color. Take, for example, this ad from Republican Duncan Hunter, who is currently under federal indictment for corruption. This is how Hunter is campaigning against his challenger Ammar Campa-Najjar, a Latino Arab-American.

DUNCAN HUNTER CAMPAIGN AD: Ammar Campa-Najjar is working to infiltrate Congress. Heís used three different names to hide his familyís ties to terrorism. His grandfather masterminded the Munich Olympic massacre. His father said they deserved to die. A Palestinian Mexican millennial Democrat named Amar Campa-Najjar doesnít get the support from the people of San Diego.

He is being supported by [care] and the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a well-orchestrated plan.

Ammar Campa-Najjar: A risk we canít ignore.

Iím Duncan Hunter, and I approve this message.

AARON MATE: An ad from Congressmember Duncan Hunter. Well, joining me to discuss racism as a campaign strategy in 2018 and well before is Ian Haney Lopez. He is a law professor at UC Berkeley, and the author of Dogwhistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class. Welcome, Professor.

Let me start by asking you about this ad tweeted out on Wednesday by President Trump. What was your reaction, and where do you think it rates in the history of racist campaign ads in this country?

IAN HANEY LOPEZ: Somewhere near an all Muslims, Mexico is sending rapists, MS-13 likes to kill people slowly, and their animals. That is, I think this rates pretty much typically for Trumpís campaign from 2015 through the election, and in the way heís governed.

AARON MATE: All right. Letís go back a little bit, because people are comparing this ad to the Willie Horton ad of 1988. And itís important to know this history, because otherwise there are some who might think if Trump was doing something unprecedented. But as your book Dogwhistle Politics well documents, this is a very old campaign strategy. So letís go back to 1988 and play the Willie Horton ad. This is at a time when the Democratic challenger Michael Dukakis, he was leading in the polls, ahead of the Republican nominee Vice President, at the time, George H.W. Bush. And then Bushís people, Lee Atwater, his campaign manager, masterminded this ad featuring Willie Horton, who was a prisoner who was let out of prison, and committed crimes while he was let out. And this was the ad that the Lee Atwater conceived of and that changed that campaign.

GEORGE H.W. BUSH CAMPAIGN AD: Bush and Dukakis on crime. Bush supports the death penalty for first degree murderers. Dukakis not only opposes the death penalty, he allowed first degree murderers to have weekend passes from prison. One was Willie Horton, who murdered a boy in a robbery, stabbing him 19 times. Despite a life sentence, Horton received 10 weekend passes from prison. Horton fled, kidnapped a young couple, stabbing the man and repeatedly raping his girlfriend. Weekend prison passes. Dukakis on crime.

AARON MATE: That was the infamous Willie Horton ad that changed the course of the 1988 campaign. Professor Haney Lopez, talk about the Willie Horton ad, and what it meant then, and how it has influenced politics since.

IAN HANEY LOPEZ: Dogwhistling really starts in the mid-1960s when the Republican Party, which was more or less equally committed with the Democratic Party to civil rights, but when Republican Party leaders figured out that they could exploit rising white anxiety generated by the civil rights movement. And itís this same dynamic that we see in terms of rising white anxiety around the election and re-election of a black president. Thereís really been a 50-year process. All throughout this process, the Democrats have understood that the Republicans were using racism as a strategy. They are using it as a wedge issue to break apart a New Deal Democratic coalition of African-Americans, the white working class, and white liberals.

Theyíve understood this since at least 1970. How would they respond? Initially they decided they wouldnít respond at all, they would ignore it. It just seemed too difficult to challenge Republican racism. That seemed to backfire, because it seemed to accuse not just the Republican politicians, but Republican voters, white voters, of being racist. So the Democrats opted to stay silent. They hoped the whole thing would blow over.

Now, you get Reaganís election and the so-called Reagan Democrats, which are white Democrats who flee the Democratic party, switch to Republican, because Reagan was dogwhistling about welfare queens and cracking down on crime. But again, Democrats were staying silent. Then you get the Bush-Dukakis run. Dukakis isnít talking about race. And all of a sudden, George H.W. Bush comes out with the Willie Horton ad. He comes from behind in the race. He takes the lead, he goes on to win. And so this is huge, and itís huge on a couple of different levels.

One, it proved that staying silent was no solution at all; that if you stayed silent, you were going to lose. You had to address race. Two, it left the Democrats in a trap. They couldnít stay silent. They had to address race. But they couldnít allege racism. What should they do? Enter Bill Clinton and the so-called new Democrat. Their strategy? Imitate Republican dogwhistling. So Bill Clinton says, Iím going to end welfare as a way of life. Thatís a dogwhistle. Whose way of life are we talking about? Or Bill Clinton says, Iím going to crack down on crime. Well, who supposedly are the criminals. And so what we get after Clinton, after the Willie Horton ad with Clinton, after the Willie Horton ad, what we get is a competition between the GOP and the Democrats as to which party can most appeal to fearful whites with the message that that party is going to crack down on undeserving, dangerous people of color. And this is really where, for example, mass incarceration and the war on crime come from. Not from Republicans alone, but from Republicans and Democrats together competing in terms of dogwhistle politics.

Last key point about about Willie Horton. It soon came out that the masterminds behind Willie Horton like Lee Atwater confessed to their racial motive. And so the Willie Horton ad today stands as a classic example that everybody recognizes as dogwhistling. So the move for people to compare what Trump is doing to Willie Horton is a move to say see? What Trump is doing is dogwhistling because we know the Willie Horton ad is dogwhistling. Only thing is, Trump is doing something much much worse, if you really look at the sorts of messages that he is spreading in the public.


IAN HANEY LOPEZ: So, the Willie Horton ad was really evasive. Yes, it pictured Willie Horton. No, it didnít picture the victims. It was one ad; the campaign didnít own it. They said, we disavow this. This is being run by somebody else. Weíre in a completely different setting now. Now we have a president who funded the creation of that ad. This isnít just some other group and he happened to tweet it. He paid for that ad. Heís directly endorsing that ad. And his message is not- the Willie Horton ad, if you think about the victims, they were never pictured. It was a white couple. They never were pictured. But itís implicit. Trump over and over again talks about and centers white people as the supposed victims.

So weíre now in a sort of a political era in which we have a president of the United States surrounding himself within his administration by white nationalists, people like Stephen Miller, elected with the help of white nationalists like Steve Bannon, applauded by white nationalists. Someone who says that white supremacists, when they riot, that some of them must be very fine people. This is a level of racist provocation that we havenít seen in the United States- we havenít seen this sort of racial poison since the 1950s. And in terms of a president spreading this sort of white nationalism, you really need to go back to the civil war, and to the years just after, to the years just before, before national figures of Trumpís stature and power were spreading this sort of racist hate.

AARON MATE: OK. So on that point, letís go to a clip from 1981 featuring Lee Atwater, who later on masterminded the Willie Horton ad, and ran the George H.W. Bush presidential campaign; after that chaired the Republican National Committee. But in 1981, Atwater was working inside the Reagan White House, and he was interviewed about his electoral strategy. And he laid out, in stark and offensive terms- and a warning now, because in this clip the N-word is said multiple times by Lee Atwater. But he told the interviewer about he wanted to appeal to voters through racially coded language and the audio wasnít covered by the Nation magazine a few years ago. But this is from 1981.

LEE ATWATER: Hereís how I would approach that issue as a statistician, or a political scientist- no, as a psychologist, which Iím not, is how abstract do you handle the race thing? In other words, you start out in- you donít want to quote me on this, are you? You start out in 1954 by saying, ďN i g g e r, n i g g e r,  n i g g er.Ē By 1968 you canít say ďn i g g e rĒ- that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, stateís rights, and all that stuff. And you get so abstract, now, youíre talking about cutting taxes. And all these things youíre talking about are totally economic things. And a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. Iím not saying that. But Iím saying that if it is getting that abstract and that coded, that weíre doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. Do you follow me? Because obviously, sitting around saying we want to cut taxes, we want to cut this, and we want Ö Is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than ďN i g g e r, n i g g e r. Ē You know. So any way you look at it, race is coming on the backburner.

AARON MATE: Thatís Republican strategist Lee Atwater speaking in 1981. Now, later on in his life, about a decade later, he developed a terminal illness. And itís said that on his deathbed he developed remorse for his actions, and he even wrote letters of apology to people who he had targeted with his racist smear efforts. But there he is, laying out in stark terms the strategy that he masterminded. Haney Lopez, is it fair to say that that Atwater strategy is still very much alive today?

IAN HANEY LOPEZ: Very much so. But I want to, I want to stop and really make two points about what Atwater is saying. We hear him saying the GOP is going to campaign in racial code. Thatís point number one. Most people donít get past that. Whatís actually most important about that Atwater quote is the second thing heís saying, that the GOP can talk about tax cuts and attack, and attack- and they can sell tax cuts through a racial narrative of dangerous and undeserving people of color. And we really, really have to unpack that. Thatís the only way weíre going to understand Donald Trump and his racist fearmongering, and Donald Trump and a trillion and a half dollar tax cut for his billionaire backers. Those are not two separate things. Theyíre directly connected through dogwhistling.

Itís really important that we understand that dogwhistling has an ideological project. Not just stir racial panic, but convince people that the real threat in their lives is government; get white voters to turn against government in a way that allows the right to hijack government for their corporate donors. So I want to stop, and I want to really go through that.

Hereís the message. For example- and Ronald Reagan perfected this- talk about welfare queens. The minute you talk about welfare queens, you conjure the image of undeserving black women cheating and ripping off the system. But then pivot and say, you know who the real enemy is? Itís government, because itís government is taking hard-earned tax dollars from decent, innocent whites, and giving it to these undeserving black people. Right? So the message is hate and resent people of color. But really hate government. Governmentís the enemy. It coddles minorities with welfare, it refuses to control them through lax criminal law. Itís why we have to crack down on crime. It refuses to control them through unsecure borders. Does it matter to Trump that we have the highest sustained levels of deportation in the history of the nation? No. The narrative is you canít trust government. Youíve got to hate government, because government is opening the doors. Government refuses to control these people.

Now, what should you do if you hate government? One, starve it. Cut off its funds. Cut taxes for the billionaires. Two, if you canít trust government, you should reward the people who are the real engines for progress in America, the corporations. Let them write the rules. So we say deregulation, or the right says deregulation. What they really mean is let corporations write the rules of the game. And they are. Three, if government is a problem, then all of those social programs- you know, things like public education, or healthcare, or environmental regulation- get rid of those, because government really cares more about undeserving people of color than it does about hardworking, decent, real Americans.

The narrative of dogwhistling is a narrative that says resent people of color, but hate and turn against government. And when you turn against government, you get rule by the rich. In other words, you get Donald Trump. Donald Trump, more than any politician that weíve had in the last 50 years, absolutely crystallizes the sort of fundamental politics of dogwhistling. Racial fearmongering to help elect a billionaire who is completely corrupt, and all he cares about, his billionaire friends and his billionaire backers, and has just rewarded them with a trillion-dollar tax cut thatís coming out of the pockets of all the rest of us. Meanwhile, theyíre busy trying to cut off our healthcare, trying to make sure that people with pre-existing illnesses canít get health coverage, because that way they can shuffle a few more dollars to the billionaires.

Thatís the story that we need to tell. Thatís the politics we need to understand to truly understand how dogwhistle politics is working today.

AARON MATE: Ian Haney Lopez , UC Berkeley law professor, author of Dogwhistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class, thanks very much.

IAN HANEY LOPEZ: Thank you so much.

AARON MATE: Thank you for joining us on The Real News.


« Last Edit: November 03, 2018, 05:26:25 pm by AGelbert »
Rob not the poor, because he is poor: neither oppress the afflicted in the gate:
For the Lord will plead their cause, and spoil the soul of those that spoiled them. Pr. 22:22-23


+-Recent Topics

Wind Power by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 02:42:48 pm

Science by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 02:31:35 pm

The American Dream by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 02:04:44 pm

Genocide by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 01:15:47 pm

Profiles in Courage by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 12:59:14 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 12:35:18 pm

Plants Which are BOTH Nutritional and Medicinal by AGelbert
June 17, 2021, 11:58:27 am

COVID-19 🏴☠️ Pandemic by AGelbert
June 16, 2021, 12:57:36 pm

Books and Audio Books that may interest you 🧐 by AGelbert
June 15, 2021, 05:50:08 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
June 15, 2021, 04:40:13 pm