+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 48
Latest: watcher
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 16867
Total Topics: 271
Most Online Today: 1208
Most Online Ever: 1208
(March 28, 2024, 07:28:27 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 221
Total: 221

Author Topic: 2020 Presidential Election  (Read 18602 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Four reasons why Biden shocked Sanders
The scale of Biden's rout has no comparison.


But the impact of black voters was more important than the numbers suggest. It was Biden’s landslide victory in South Carolina that pushed party leaders around the country to back Biden in the 48 hours after the Saturday primary there. The Democratic establishment was divided and feckless before South Carolina. After African Americans weighed in, party leaders rallied around Biden. It’s the opposite of what political scientists often argue happens in a primary, when party leaders coalesce around a candidate early and voters follow along. For Biden, that dynamic happened after black voters had spoken in South Carolina. (One caveat: the black Democratic leadership of the state, especially Rep. Jim Clyburn, was clearly influential.)

Once the Democratic establishment spoke, the effect was powerful. When voters in a party are divided ;) on a big issue, it’s a well-known fact that cues from respected party leaders can have a 😈 galvanizing effect. This happened recently when polling showed that Democrats were divided on the question of whether Donald Trump should be impeached. At the time of those polls, leaders in Congress were also divided. Once high-profile Democratic skeptics like Nancy Pelosi joined the pro-impeachment camp, creating a unified party position, the division among voters also disappeared. Something very similar happened with Biden after South Carolina and the firehose of major endorsements.

It’s only the degree of the shift that was so surprising. But it’s been clear that late-breaking positive news can have profound effects in a primary in which voters have been sloshing between several candidates all year. Biden hit a jackpot of timing. By one estimate the amount of positive coverage he received after the polls closed in South Carolina was worth over $100 million. The results seem to answer rather definitely that so-called earned media — free coverage — is superior to paid advertising.

As of late Tuesday Mike Bloomberg was on track to win four delegates, which would mean he paid over $100 million per delegate.

Finally, Biden was partially  assisted by the dramatic rearrangement of the viable candidates after South Carolina when the moderates, Amy Klobuchar and Pete Buttigieg, dropped out while the left was divided by Warren remaining in the race. Biden might not have won Massachusetts or Minnesota, where the totals for Warren and Sanders exceeded Biden’s support, in a one-on-one race. And Warren likely kept Sanders from winning more delegates in California and Texas. (Though the impact of Bloomberg, who was on track to best Warren in both states, may have harmed Biden as much as Warren harmed Sanders. )



I disagree with the basic premise of the above article. That is, that the VOTE COUNT for Biden in South Carolina on saturday, AND everywhere else on Super Tuesday, was legitimate. It was NOT. It was RIGGED to make it look like a "horse race" between Biden and Sanders. The key to rigging an election in favor of the establishment candidate is to make it look like it is a "close race" so the people are fooled into believing the outcome is legitimate (SEE: democracy PIG LIPSTICK).

Moreover, to claim that the other candidates, who so conveniently dropped out AND ENDORSED BIDEN prior to Super Tuesday, only "partially" helped Biden is absolute BULLSHIT. Anyone who does not want to see the OBVIOUS CONSPIRACY by the DNC to use all those candidates as stalking horses for Biden, FROM THE GET-GO, is a duplicitous liar or a fool. The proof in that particularly CORRUPT DNC pudding is that WARREN DID NOT drop out. The REASON for her not dropping out is to SPLIT the vote away from Sanders with her FAKE PROGRESSIVE campaign. The difference between Warren and the others will "magically disappear" when Warren ENDORSES BIDEN at the DNC corrupted Democratic Party Convention.

Today, Bloomberg dropped out. What a strange coincidence that he drops out just before the "final Democratic Party winner" is figured for Califonia...

ANYONE, unlike RYAN LIZZA, the author of the above Biden defending PUFF PIECE, with two HONEST brain cells to rub together can see that all this was planned to wear Sanders down FROM THE START. Despite the inconvenient (for the DNC) FACT that Trump will EASILY eat Biden's election lunch, AND SANDERS would DESTROY TRUMP in the election, the Capitalist (Fascist loving) Truth is that the DNC would rather have Trump than Sanders.

It is 2016 all over again. Have a nice day.   
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

 

+-Recent Topics

Future Earth by AGelbert
March 30, 2022, 12:39:42 pm

Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF by AGelbert
March 29, 2022, 08:20:56 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
March 28, 2022, 01:12:42 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
March 27, 2022, 02:27:28 pm

Heat Pumps by AGelbert
March 26, 2022, 03:54:43 pm

Defending Wildlife by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 02:04:23 pm

The Koch Brothers Exposed! by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 01:26:11 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 12:46:08 pm

Books and Audio Books that may interest you 🧐 by AGelbert
March 24, 2022, 04:28:56 pm

COVID-19 🏴☠️ Pandemic by AGelbert
March 23, 2022, 12:14:36 pm