+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 48
Latest: watcher
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 16867
Total Topics: 271
Most Online Today: 140
Most Online Ever: 1208
(March 28, 2024, 07:28:27 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 124
Total: 124

Author Topic: Photvoltaics (PV)  (Read 21321 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #105 on: August 01, 2015, 02:20:32 pm »
07/31/2015 02:35 PM     

If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them: Utilities Getting Into Solar Installation Business   ;D
SustainableBusiness.com News

Utilities may be starting to see the light - if you can't beat them, join them - when it comes to solar.

 While some continue to charge extra fees to make solar less attractive, several utilities are starting to offer their own solar leasing programs.

NRG Energy is leading; Arizona's Tucson Power has installed 2000 systems and wants to double that, and Georgia Power's program just began.   

 Now, NY State's major utility, ConEdison will install SunPower's solar systems on homes across the state. It's a typical leasing model: ConEdison will take full responsibility for installing and maintaining the systems, and homeowners will pay fixed,  lower monthly fees under 20-year contracts. The program begins in August. 

SunPower is the first solar company to be earn cradle-to-cradle certification:


NY's historic Reforming the Energy Vision is surely providing a strong incentive for ConEd, changing the way utilities operate in the state. The state is moving deliberately away from the centralized utility model toward distributed energy.

As of 2014, NY has 397 MW of solar - almost half added last year - and another 250 MW expected this year. 89 MW are residential, 49 MW commercial and  9 MW  utility scale, according to Solar Energies Industry Association. There are 538  companies in the value chain in the state, employing over 7,300 people.

Solar leasing is by far the program of choice for residential solar, accounting for 72% of the 1.2 GW installed in the US last year, according to GTM Research. But with solar costs plummeting, that's not expected to last. By 2020, over 50% of systems will be owned by homeowners.

Read our articles, It's a First: California Rules Bring Rooftop Solar to Electricity Markets and Utilities Get Paid to Build Out Washington State's Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure.

 In related news, SunPower just bought 1.6 GW of solar projects in 11 states from Infigen Energy, an Australian developer. SunPower is the second largest solar installer in the US.

http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/26399
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #106 on: August 01, 2015, 03:41:28 pm »


Agelbert NOTE: Senator Sanders recently introduced the following bill. If YOUR HOUSEHOLD makes less than 80% of the median wage in your state, your household would be eligible for a GRANT, not simply a loan, that included ALL the upfront costs of purchasing and installing PV Renewable Energy on your house. Please read this bill and urge your friends to do so as well.

For those of you that don't qualify, this is a good deal as well! WHY? Because all the added distributed Renewable Energy will FORCE the price of fossil fuels DOWN along with the electricity rates! That means LESS pollution and MORE money in your pocket!     

We-the-People NEED this bill!     


Quote
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.  This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Low-Income Solar Act’’.

SEC. 2. LOAN AND GRANT PROGRAM FOR SOLAR INSTALLATIONS IN LOW-INCOME AND UNDERSERVED AREAS.

Sanders Introduces Solar Initiative
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-introduces-solar-initiative

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/download/solarbill/?inline=file
Pass it on!
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #107 on: August 05, 2015, 03:28:16 pm »
A logic challenged defender of dirty energy gets taken to task, so to speak.  ;D

Quote

James Rust says   

March 29, 2015 at 23:52   


Present solar PV systems have a practical operating lifetime of 25 years. Systems in place today will be obsolete by 2040. We need more data before anyone can say solar energy is competitive. All the projections given for 2 cents per kilowatt-hour ignore the costs of backup power that may run inefficiently due to the intermittent operation of solar.

An interesting way of look at solar is to consider the energy return of investment (EROI). This is the amount of energy produced by an energy source divided by the energy needed to produce the source. Usually the energy needed to produce a source is fossil fuels. EROI for petroleum is typically 10. A recent study of solar energy in Spain showed an EORI of 2.45.

Promoters of solar energy are too optimistic. They leave taxpayers and ratepayers the problems of cleaning up their messes. 

James H. Rust, Professor of nuclear engineering 


Reply



Louise Stoningtonl says   

May 5, 2015 at 05:59   


There used to be oil in the US that just gushed out of the ground. For that oil, you could get 50, maybe even 100 times as much fuel as you had to use to get it. That is gone. Now they pump down chemicals to push it out of the ground, more energy intensive – maybe then you get 10 times more fuel than you have to use. Or they have to dig out the sticky tar and boil it and dilute it before it can be refined. That takes almost as much fuel as you get! Have you seen pictures of the tar sands tailings ponds? That is a mess. A solar spill is a nice day.
 There are solar panels made 40 years ago that are still functioning. Studies show a slight (5 to 10%) loss in power production after 25 years.

Reply

 


William Sharpe
says   

June 1, 2015 at 19:51   


The expected lifespan of an energy source is part of its LCOE calculation. How can you not know this?

The necessity for backup power is also a non-issue. Battery storage has many additional benefits to the grid which make it sensible to install even at prices far above current (rapidly dropping) costs. Basically, gas peaking plants were an expensive mistake and many existing plants should not have been built.

Reply

 


gg says   

June 23, 2015 at 14:03   


It is interesting that “James H. Rust, Professor of nuclear engineering” is blissfully unaware that the 1970s/1980s era solar panels with “a practical operating lifetime of 10 years” are still functioning in many places. Indeed, their “practical operating lifetime” seems to have been severely underestimated! So what about the new panels, which are supposed to last twice as long as the inferior, old ones?

And don’t get me even started on EROI. German companies now manufacture panels with less than half a ton of CO2 emissions per kWp. Even with a modest capacity factor of 15%, the amount of electricity generated within 30 years can’t possibly be so low as to only double or triple the energy investment. That Spanish estimate of EROI of less than three is utter BS. Why not compare it with nuclear plants using the same criteria? :-p http://www.nature.com/scientificamerican/journal/v308/n4/box/scientificamerican0413-58_BX2.html

But maybe that’s what nuclear energy REALLY does to you: it won’t give you cancer, but it overwhelms your coolness perception centers, wipes out your critical thinking skills, and makes you casually dismiss actual historical data.

Reply

 


stuart says   

July 20, 2015 at 18:35   


Lithium batteries with efficiency of 90% emerging as the key to back up… Battery cost and robustness is nearly there… I think Elon Musk is right…


Fraunhofer: Solar power will cost 2 cts/kWh in 2050


http://www.energypost.eu/fraunhofer-solar-power-will-cost-2-ctskwh-2050/

Agelbert NOTE: James Rust is a dissembling, double talking, EROI, LCOE challenged .


He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #108 on: August 08, 2015, 06:09:12 pm »

Solar-Powered Noise Barriers Quiet Traffic While Generating Electricity

 

Cole Mellino | August 3, 2015 2:20 pm

From the country that brought you the solar road comes solar noise barriers. Highway noise barriers are usually not very aesthetically pleasing and only serve one purpose—to quiet traffic for the surrounding community. But a researcher in the Netherlands, Michael Debije at the Eindhoven University of Technology, is trying to change all that.

Since April, Debije has launched two pilot projects along the A2 highway in the Netherlands to test a new kind of solar panel he has developed. Using an innovative technology known as luminescent solar concentrators (LSC), the translucent sheets “bounce light internally to the edges of the panels, where it is beamed onto regular solar panels in concentrated form,” says Fast Coexist. The year-long pilot project will help determine how well the barriers hold up in terms of power generation capabilities and with vandal-resistance and maintenance requirements.





Because the barriers are so aesthetically pleasing and translucent, they could be used in urban areas to reduce noise pollution. Photo credit: Eindhoven University of Technology


The panels are ideal for the gray skies of Northern Europe because they work even on cloudy days. A single half-mile stretch can provide enough electricity to power 50 homes.

“The LSC panels can be made in different colors, so the result is something like an oversized stained-glass window,” says Fast Coexist. “Because light can shine through them, they could be used in urban areas, shielding noise without making either pedestrians or motorists feel cut off.”


Debije says thanks to recent breakthroughs with LSC panels, they are now a commercially viable product. Photo credit: Eindhoven University of Technology

Debije and his team published a paper in Nature this spring that shows how they have overcome previous problems with LSC panels, and the team now claims they are commercially viable, according to Tech Times. “Further benefits are that the principle used is low cost, they can be produced in any desired, regular color, is robust, and the LSCs will even work when the sky is cloudy,” Debije told Tech Times. “That means it offers tremendous potential.”


http://ecowatch.com/2015/08/03/solar-highway-noise-barriers/
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #109 on: August 10, 2015, 07:26:39 pm »
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #110 on: August 14, 2015, 05:39:28 pm »
Grade B, C and used Modules and laminates are the best buy in the industry if price is $.48 B, .36 C for modules; $.34 used (5 yrs. or less) and .25/W for laminates, FOB warehouse or less.

Posted on August 8, 2015 by John Kimball

That’s my general opinion. So is my belief that all of these modules are practically identical to brand new Grade A modules in terms of producing their rated power and having an expected lifetime of 30 to 40 years. That’s because I have sold hundreds of MW’s of every almost every brand of PV module over the last 40 years and the return rate of Grade A modules has actually been the highest of them all!

Other factors to consider are: importability, shipping cost, inventory availability, certification, warranty, brand, specifications, time to arrival, payment terms, and acceptable methods of payment.

Keep in mind inventory availability can go up and down in the industry based on supply and demand just like the $/watt cost. So beware of getting stuck with too much inventory and watching in horror as the price plunges! Or just the opposite, not having enough inventory when the price sky rockets because of a shortage.

The forth quarter is when you should expect shortages and $/W price increases. Also just prior to the termination of any major federal, state, or utility solar incentives.
Right now you have both these things happening at the same time. Plus the US has a new law preventing us from buying any modules from China or Taiwan and US production is at an all time low.

BR
John

http://sunelec.com/blog/
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #112 on: August 15, 2015, 03:40:54 pm »
Quote
Grade B, C and used Modules and laminates are the best buy in the industry if price is $.48 B, .36 C for modules; $.34 used (5 yrs. or less) and .25/W for laminates, FOB warehouse or less.

Posted on August 8, 2015 by John Kimball

That’s my general opinion. So is my belief that all of these modules are practically identical to brand new Grade A modules in terms of producing their rated power and having an expected lifetime of 30 to 40 years. That’s because I have sold hundreds of MW’s of every almost every brand of PV module over the last 40 years and the return rate of Grade A modules has actually been the highest of them all!

Other factors to consider are: importability, shipping cost, inventory availability, certification, warranty, brand, specifications, time to arrival, payment terms, and acceptable methods of payment.

Keep in mind inventory availability can go up and down in the industry based on supply and demand just like the $/watt cost. So beware of getting stuck with too much inventory and watching in horror as the price plunges! Or just the opposite, not having enough inventory when the price sky rockets because of a shortage.

The forth quarter is when you should expect shortages and $/W price increases. Also just prior to the termination of any major federal, state, or utility solar incentives.
Right now you have both these things happening at the same time. Plus the US has a new law preventing us from buying any modules from China or Taiwan and US production is at an all time low.

BR
John

http://sunelec.com/blog/

Went to his blog and read this, which I totally agree with:

What we are seeing now, are very high quality modules from every manufacturer. It’s because of minor problems that they are coming down, mostly because of fine print included in contracts for the investors of these systems. These modules still have UL and other safety certifications, however, its my opinion that the best way to re-use them is on low voltage battery based systems of 12, 24 or 48 volts. My advice is not to use them on high voltage grid-tie 300 Volt or higher systems. Keep it simple, use battery based, central inverter systems. Enjoy the feeling of being totally independent no matter what happens. And remember, “When the Power Goes Down the SUN Comes Up”, tm.

John



 

That's the kind of nuts and bolts know-how knowledge that people need to (profitably   ;D) get on board the Renewable Revolution. Great catch, Eddie! 
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #113 on: August 20, 2015, 09:30:09 pm »
Solar Cell Efficiency Could Double with Novel “Green” Antenna    
   
With the goal of producing solar energy conversion devices that are environmentally friendly, green and sustainable, scientists at UConn are designing and evaluating artificial light antenna systems using biological soft materials

August 18, 2015

By Renewable Energy World Editors
 
The use of solar energy in the U.S. is growing, but panels on rooftops are still a rare sight. They cost thousands of dollars, and homeowners don’t recoup costs for years even in the sunniest or best-subsidized locales for at least a few years. But scientists may have a solution. They report today the development of a unique, “green” antenna that could potentially double the efficiencies of certain kinds of solar cells and make them more affordable.

The researchers are presenting their work at the 250th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS). ACS, the world’s largest scientific society, is holding the meeting in Boston through Thursday. It features more than 9,000 presentations on a wide range of science topics.

“Most of the light from the sun is emitted over a very broad window of wavelengths,” says Challa V. Kumar, Ph.D. “If you want to use solar energy to produce electric current, you want to harvest as much of that spectrum as possible.”

But the silicon solar cells people buy today are not very efficient in the blue part of the light spectrum. So Kumar’s team at the University of Connecticut built an antenna that collects those unused blue photons and then converts them to lower energy photons that the silicon can then turn into current.

“Many groups around the world are working hard to make this kind of antenna, and ours is the first of its kind in the whole world,” he says.

Commercial solar cells do a good job of converting light from about 600 to 1,000 nanometers (nm) into electric current but not from the 350 to 600 nm range. That’s part of the reason solar cells on the market today are only about 11 to 15 percent efficient. High-end panels can reach 25 percent efficiency but are unaffordable for most customers. Lab prototypes can reach even higher efficiencies but are difficult to scale up.

Converting the mostly unused portion of the light spectrum to wavelengths solar cells can use in an affordable way is far from a simple task. To tackle this problem, Kumar turned to organic dyes. Photons in light excite dye molecules, which can then, under the right circumstances, relax and emit less energetic but more silicon-friendly photons.

But to get dye molecules to work together, they need to be wrapped individually and densely, while satisfying certain quantum mechanical requirements. To address this issue, they embed the dyes inside a protein-lipid hydrogel by mixing them together, warming them up and then cooling them to room temperature. With this simple process, the material wraps around individual dye molecules, keeping them separated while packing them densely. Rather than creating a radio-like antenna, however, the procedure results in a thin, pinkish film that can be coated on top of a solar cell.

“It’s very simple chemistry,” Kumar says. “It can be done in the kitchen or in a remote village. That makes it inexpensive to produce.”   


These antennas are made with biological and non-toxic materials that are edible in theory, Kumar says. “Not that you would want to eat your solar cells, but they should be compostable so they won’t accumulate in the environment,” he says.

Now his team is working with a Connecticut company to figure out how to apply the artificial antenna to commercial solar cells. In other projects, they also are figuring out ways to use the versatile hydrogel for drug delivery and white light-emitting diodes.

Kumar acknowledges funding from the University of Connecticut and the National Science Foundation.

Strategy to Make Artificial Light Harvesting Complexes


Agelbert NOTE: Excellent comment by Gerry Wootton

Photon conversion seems an obvious means of improving the efficiency of a junction device; however, no folding of the short wavelength portion of the solar spectrum against the QE characteristic of a silicon solar cell results in a doubling of the overall efficiency.

Photon down-conversion would counteract the problem of short absorption depth of short wave photons and poor short wave performance of typical AR coatings for cells; however, in an assembly, those photons must first penetrate glazing and encapsulant/laminati­on film which would at least require more expensive materials and likely a change of laminating process.

As practitioners know, it has taken a lot of time and effort to arrive at laminating materials which exhibit low degradation when exposed to sunlight even when UV is substantially attenuated by glazing.

One issue with photon converters is the extent to which they diffuse incident light - how that interacts with light trapping properties and how much it increases back-scatter.

Intro­ducing an additional layer to the laminated stack presents issues as to how the RI sequence is changed / how optical efficiency is affected and how the strength of lamination is affected. Also, new interior layers must tolerate the temperature/pressure of a lamination process.

One possible approach is to integrate a photon converter into the first surface of the glazing; for example, using a diffusion process (patent applied for) or epitaxial process but must entail a process which does not degrade or ideally assists the glass toughening process; most organic materials can not tolerated required process temperatures.

Another possibility is to add layers to the first surface of the glazing  ideally with a low RI protective coat, possibly teflon or acrylic.

Assuming at least some attendant inefficiency and increased cost, an ideal converter should have some gain, e.g. 1->2 photon conversion, or some complex conversion, e.g. 2->3, although these are statistically inefficient and may or may not produce net gain.

As always two important factors are degradation over 25+ years, ideally less than that of the photabsorber itself, and the incremental cost in proportion to the incremental efficiency gain (it can be shown that the value of solar modules in $/Wp in array applications is softly exponential with module efficiency; note: module efficiency is only partly a function of cell efficiency).

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2015/08/solar-cell-efficiency-could-double-with-novel-green-antenna.html
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #114 on: August 25, 2015, 02:38:24 pm »
Broomfield firm to build Colorado's largest solar farm near Pueblo
156-megawatt solar farm plant will generate enough electricity to power to 31,000 homes    

By Aldo Svaldi
The Denver Post


Colorado officials and SunEdison break ground on the Comanche Solar plant in Pueblo on Thursday, August 20, 2015. (Handout)

Renewable Energy Systems Americas will construct Colorado's largest solar farm, one that backers say will produce electricity more cheaply than natural gas-powered sources.
Broomfield-based RES expects to employ 300 to 400 workers to build the Comanche Solar project, which broke ground Thursday 7 miles south of Pueblo.

"Our current expectations are that the majority of these workers are local or would be sourced locally," said RES spokesman Scott Dunaway.

SunEdison, the world's largest developer of renewable energy projects, raised $253 million for the project and will run the solar farm with four employees once it is operating.

The farm's 500,000 panels will stretch across about 1,000 acres, with a capacity of 156 megawatts that will generate enough power to supply 31,000 homes, said Paul Gaynor, an executive vice president with SunEdison, which is based in Belmont, Calif.

Several factors contribute to lowering the project's price tag and making it cost competitive  with natural gas generation , Gaynor said. Those include economies of scale, existing roads in the area, and "plug-and-play" access to transmission lines serving a nearby power plant.   

Public Service Company of Colorado, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy, has signed a 25-year purchase agreement with SunEdison.

Under a Colorado law passed in 2010, the state's largest utilities must obtain at least 30 percent of their power supply from renewable sources by 2020.

The project, while helping meet that goal, was won in a competitive bid not limited to renewable sources and won't carry the "solar" label.

Gaynor said SunEdison has additional wind and solar projects that it can bring forward when utilities in the state want to purchase more power generation.

RES employs more than 500 people and has developed or built more than 10 gigawatts of renewable energy projects worldwide, including the 250-megawatt Cedar Point wind facility near Limon, completed in 2011. 

RES expects to complete the Comanche Solar project by the second quarter of 2016, although winter weather could complicate that timetable, Dunaway said.

Aldo Svaldi: 303-954-1410, asvaldi@denverpost.com or twitter.com/aldosvaldi


Jeff Ackermann, Colorado Energy Office director signs a solar panel at the 156 MW Comanche Solar ground breaking event in Pueblo on Thursday, August 20, 2015. (Handout)

http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_28676186/broomfield-firm-build-states-largest-solar-farm-near
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #115 on: August 26, 2015, 06:43:03 pm »
08/26/2015 12:40 PM     

US Navy Buys Solar For 14 California Bases  ;D

SustainableBusiness.com News

In the largest renewable energy purchase by the US government to date, the Navy is buying solar energy to partially power 14 training centers and bases in California. 

The Navy contracted for the entire output of the 210 MW, Mesquite 3 solar project - under construction about 60 miles from Phoenix, Arizona. It will supply a third of the electricity for 14 Navy and Marine installations over the 25-year power purchase agreement.

Developer Sempra US Gas & Power is installing over 650,000 solar PV panels that track the sun. The Navy expects to save at least $90 million on energy costs over the life of the contract. It comes online by the end of 2016.

The Navy's goal is to buy 1 gigawatt of renewable energy by the end of this year.

All this stems from a 2009 mandate from Congress, directing the Department of Defense to achieve 25% renewable energy by 2025. DoD even raised that goal, requiring the Army, Air Force and Navy to each procure 1 GW of renewables by the end of 2015. 

The Navy's on track to exceed that with 1.2 GW in the pipeline, and has its own goal to "produce 50% of all energy from renewables by 2020.   

It's also moving aggressively on biofuels, announcing last year that they are the "new normal." Besides being included in all  solicitations for jet engine and marine diesel fuels, the Navy is contracting for on-site bio-refineries at bases across the world.

Read our articles, Department of Defense Integrates Climate Change Into All Operations and Almost 10% of Solar Industry Are Veterans.

Learn more about the Navy & Renewable Energy:
 
Website: http://greenfleet.dodlive.mil/energy/repo

http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/26407
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Photvoltaics (PV) - MPPT charge controllers are better than PWM 


Quote
A good MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking) charger might give you 10-30% more power than a good PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) controller. This is because solar panels rarely give optimum output at the correct charging voltage for your batteries.

With a PWM controller when the panel voltage is less than the battery voltage you get no charge at all (cloudy situations) and in sunny times everything above say 14.4v is thrown away.

An MPPT charge controller can solve both these issues while maintaining the panels at their optimum voltage.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R3SBC1OCDXL9DT/ref=cm_cr_pr_viewpnt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B008KWPGAE#R3SBC1OCDXL9DT



All About Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) Solar Charge Controllers

SNIPPET:

How a Maximum Power Point Tracker Works:

The Power point tracker is a high frequency DC to DC converter. They take the DC input from the solar panels, change it to high frequency AC, and convert it back down to a different DC voltage and current to exactly match the panels to the batteries. MPPT's operate at very high audio frequencies, usually in the 20-80 kHz range. The advantage of high frequency circuits is that they can be designed with very high efficiency transformers and small components. The design of high frequency circuits can be very tricky because the problems with portions of the circuit "broadcasting" just like a radio transmitter and causing radio and TV interference. Noise isolation and suppression becomes very important.

There are a few non-digital (that is, linear) MPPT's charge controls around. These are much easier and cheaper to build and design than the digital ones.

They do improve efficiency somewhat, but overall the efficiency can vary a lot - and we have seen a few lose their "tracking point" and actually get worse.

That can happen occasionally if a cloud passed over the panel - the linear circuit searches for the next best point, but then gets too far out on the deep end to find it again when the sun comes out. Thankfully, not many of these around any more.

The power point tracker (and all DC to DC converters) operates by taking the DC input current, changing it to AC, running through a transformer (usually a toroid, a doughnut looking transformer), and then rectifying it back to DC, followed by the output regulator. In most DC to DC converters, this is strictly an electronic process - no real smarts are involved except for some regulation of the output voltage.

Charge controllers for solar panels need a lot more smarts as light and temperature conditions vary continuously all day long, and battery voltage changes.



Smart power trackers

All recent models of digital MPPT controllers available are microprocessor controlled.

They know when to adjust the output that it is being sent to the battery, and they actually shut down for a few microseconds and "look" at the solar panel and battery and make any needed adjustments.

Although not really new (the Australian company AERL had some as early as 1985), it has been only recently that electronic microprocessors have become cheap enough to be cost effective in smaller systems (less than 1 KW of panel).

MPPT charge controls are now manufactured by several companies, such as Outback Power, Xantrex XW-SCC, Blue Sky Energy, Apollo Solar, Midnite Solar, Morningstar and a few others.

http://www.solar-electric.com/mppt-solar-charge-controllers.html

He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #117 on: August 31, 2015, 12:02:09 am »
 Pilot Program will Provide Energy Efficient Manufactured Homes in DE     
June 20th, 2015 Matthew Silver


(Photo credit: wdel107fm-solar panels on roof of manufactured home)

Tweetsolar_panels_on_manufactured_homes__wdel107_fm__creditThe Delaware Sustainable Energy Utility says thousands of Delawareans are living in energy inefficient manufactured homes whose residents are spending twice as much per square foot on energy costs, according to wdel107fm.

Tony DePrima, executive director of the state-created organization, said his staff is working on a pilot program that would bring zero net energy manufactured homes to residents in need. He envisions energy efficient appliances and HVAC systems with solar panels that could generate enough energy for the entire year.

“In the high use summer months, it would be producing more energy than needed and selling it back to the utility and that will make up the difference in those months when you’re not generating a lot of solar but there’s still an electric load,” said DePrima. MHProNews understands the solar panels would be installed on the roofs of the homes.

The organization is trying to determine sources of financing and grants for those who want to participate in the pilot program, and hopes to have a few of the homes set up by next summer.

matthew-silver-daily-business-news-mhpronws-comArticle submitted by Matthew J. Silver to Daily Business News-MHProNews.

http://www.mhmarketingsalesmanagement.com/blogs/daily-business-news/pilot-program-will-provide-energy-efficient-manufactured-homes-in-de/
WE Trailer Treasure folks can dream too, ya know!  ;D
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #118 on: August 31, 2015, 03:56:25 pm »

The latest improvement in PV panel output efficiency improvement AFTER the DC (direct current) leaves the PV panel is known as the micro inverter. It bothers me how expensive these babies are.  >:( They raise the price of a solar system quite a bit! The price of the PV panels (per watt of output) has been steadily going down. But inverter costs have not fallen much.  :( 

An inverter is an electronic device that converts DC to AC (alternating current) electricity. That AC is virtually identical to the AC that comes into your home from the electric utility. You want this because the appliances you have that use a LOT of electricity require AC. In addition, you can run AC power through relatively cheap wires very efficiently. That is not the case with DC. DC require thick (i.e. EXPENSIVE) wires that are stiff and hard to work with. All the electronics doo dads in your home that use DC (like your computer) have their own AC to DC hardware that steps down the 120 Volts of AC ( isolation transformer) to roughly 15% more than the 12, 5 or 3 Volts AC(according to the doo dad requirement) and immediately "rectifies" (changes a sine wave to nice flat 0.01% or less current voltage variation DC  (known as full wave rectifiers).

Computers, like most DC loving doo dads, do not like varying voltage at all. It ruins them. But that's another subject. Suffice to say that converting the DC from your solar panels to AC to mix with your grid AC is the most cost effective approach to getting the most out of Solar Renewable energy.

The DC that comes out of your solar panel varies constantly in voltage. So, the inverter has to be designed to smooth out that DC before it converts it to AC at a steady 120 Volts and about 12 to 15 Amps.

The most important part of a DC to AC inverter is an electronic semiconductor called a MOSFET (Metal Oxide Field Effect Transistor). It uses at least four MOSFETS to get the job done. An additional MOSFET is used to "power" those four MOSFETS because they won't just get going all by themselves.
MOSFET (Metal Oxide Semiconducter Feld Effect Transistor)

A solar panel array used to have DC go into a big expensive inverter in your house (before your main panel sees the juice). This was inefficient. WHY? Because the DC coming from the panels, as a group, was always the lowest common denominator of DC. So, if one panel was in the shade while six (or whatever number of panels you have up there) were not, the DC energy was, for each panel, what the one in the shade was putting out.

Enter the micro inverter. This tiny inverter is plugged into one or two panels at a time. NOW, if those two panels get less sun, the output from all the other panels is not lessened.


So you end up harvesting more Renewable Energy. The downside is the cost of the micro inverters.

Can you build one yourself and save money? Yes. Will the power company let you get away with that? Probably not.  :( Unless you are an off grid guy or gal, and you don't care about rebates, RECs (Renewable Energy Credits), net metering bennies (GMP charges 14 cents a Kwh but must pay you 6 cents a Kwh for the net metered excess juice you generate) and so on, you will need to have "approved" Micro inverters. And, of course, you must pay for a "professional" (each time I hear that word, I grab my wallet for dear life!  :P) inspection by a licensed electrician (that ALSO must be "certified" to inspect/approve/disapprove solar systems for your local utility).

But, just so you can rant knowledgably at anyone wanting you to pay lots of money for a multiple micro inverter setup, here's a primer on inverter insides. If you can breadboard basic electronics, you can, in theory, build your very own inverter(s).  ;D


The MOSFETS in the diagram below are abbreviated thus: MOS.



« Last Edit: September 01, 2015, 08:49:42 pm by AGelbert »
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36274
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Photvoltaics (PV)
« Reply #119 on: September 03, 2015, 12:17:42 am »

JA Solar, Essel Set to Begin Building Solar Cell, Module Plants
 
September 1, 2015

By Anindya Upadhyay, Bloomberg

JA Solar Holdings Co., a Chinese solar manufacturer, and Essel Infraprojects Ltd. plan to begin construction of a 500 MW solar-cell factory in the south Indian state of Andhra Pradesh in December, followed later by a module plant of a similar size.

Construction follows the signing of a memorandum of understanding between Essel Infraprojects, the infrastructure arm of Essel Group, and Shanghai-based JA Solar during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s trip to China in May.

Applications for a parcel of land have been made, Essel Infraprojects Chief Executive Officer Ashok Agarwal said in an email.

The company plans to set up the manufacturing plant at the Sri City Industrial Park in Andhra Pradesh. Construction of the $150 million cell-making facility is expected to take a year.

A 500 MW module-manufacturing plant will follow, with completion expected by the first half of 2017, Agarwal said. Additional investment will be made, the executive added, without providing details.

India’s prime minister aims to install 100 GW of solar capacity in India by 2022. The country has 4 GW at the moment.

India has total installed capacity to make 1,328 MW of solar cells and 2,523 MW of modules annually, according to an Aug. 13 presentation to parliament.

©2015 Bloomberg News
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2015/09/ja-solar-essel-set-to-begin-building-solar-cell-module-plants.html?cmpid=renewable0922015&eid=291054632&bid=1166783
He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Matt 10:37

 

+-Recent Topics

Future Earth by AGelbert
March 30, 2022, 12:39:42 pm

Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF by AGelbert
March 29, 2022, 08:20:56 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
March 28, 2022, 01:12:42 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
March 27, 2022, 02:27:28 pm

Heat Pumps by AGelbert
March 26, 2022, 03:54:43 pm

Defending Wildlife by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 02:04:23 pm

The Koch Brothers Exposed! by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 01:26:11 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
March 25, 2022, 12:46:08 pm

Books and Audio Books that may interest you 🧐 by AGelbert
March 24, 2022, 04:28:56 pm

COVID-19 🏴☠️ Pandemic by AGelbert
March 23, 2022, 12:14:36 pm