+- +-


Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Total Members: 49
Latest: molly
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 13007
Total Topics: 260
Most Online Today: 5
Most Online Ever: 137
(April 21, 2019, 04:54:01 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 0
Total: 0

Author Topic: Electric Vehicles  (Read 10784 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 30152
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Electric Vehicles
« Reply #360 on: February 28, 2018, 12:27:24 pm »

February 27th, 2018 by Frugal Moogal

Originally published on EV Obsession.

Iíve been reading EV Obsession and CleanTechnica for a while now, using it to help examine electric car costs and pricing to determine how these upcoming vehicles will impact us on a cost basis, and I have read article after article about the Tesla Semi. The articles followed a pattern that it seems like happens with every Tesla product: Tesla announces a product reveal, there are articles hypothesizing about what Tesla will do, then there are articles saying it isnít possible, then there are articles saying that other companies will do it better before it comes out and no one will care.

Tesla held the Semi reveal event and of course the pattern restarted, now with two different products ó the Semi and the Roadster.  The recent statement from Daimlerís head of trucks that the Tesla Semi defies the laws of physics is a continuation of this trend, and it convinced me to write.

Before I go on, I think itís worth pointing out why I think what Iím about say has any value. The merits of EVs are often debated based on environmental friendliness metrics or what the sexiest ones can do.

Neither of those arguments really compel me at all.

Are EVs more environmentally friendly? Sure. But you know what is even more environmentally friendly? Not driving at all.

Are they sexier? Maybe. Tastes in cars vary, but I challenge anyone to look at an original Nissan Leaf and declare it a ďsexyĒ car.

Take away those two arguments, and itís where I come in. Ultimately, I believe itís people like me who donít look at those factors as to why EVs are about to dominate. But thatís for another time.

I worked at a big business with significant control over a multi-million dollar budget. I was at the table for seven-figure purchases with the other party promising us performance that competitors claimed impossible. I live in the world of stats and figures, and use them to sniff out what is possible.

With that, I want to stick the business lens on the Tesla Semi and make some predictions. And sorry, Daimler, I think youíve been passed by.

When Musk first stated Tesla would make a long-haul Semi, the article pattern began. Then there was the reveal, complete with stats that seem almost cartoonish. The pattern restarted. Weíre still hearing that the stats must be impossible.

Letís back up and look at this like a business. Iím certain that the prototypes are the real deal, and the stats are conservative if anything. Hereís why:

Elon Musk cited the stats for the truck. I already hear those that question Tesla saying, ďYeah, Elon says a lot of things. So?Ē And to be honest, thatís true. Elon says things that he wants to do in Twitter a lot.

But this was different. If you were watching through Teslaís website as he was saying it, information popped up to pre-order the truck.

If Musk said the truck would go 500 miles knowing it canít, that is a textbook case of false advertising. All you need to prove false advertising is show that you were misled by the advertising and suffered ďinjuryĒ as a result. Want an open-and-shut false advertising case? Buy a Tesla Semi, load it up, drive it on a 500 mile route, and have it run out of juice.

I expect that the semi will be able to go 500 miles at highway speed fully loaded. Not because Elon Musk said so, but because Elon Musk said so at a public event for the Semi where Tesla opened orders for the truck itself. You donít name aspirational numbers at an event where you begin actively selling the product if you want your company to survive.

And before anyone says, ďyeah, but they are selling fully autonomous driving without that capability yet,Ē yes, they are Ö but when you buy it, they tell you it is a feature that will be coming in the future, not when you get the car.

For the cost to operate per mile, electricity cost has been questioned as an ďunrealisticĒ 7 cents per kWh. That might be unrealistic based on what you pay for your home electricity, but it was a guarantee. Another easy open-and-shut false advertising case.

Iím not going to get into the nitty gritty on why Iím sure the stats they showed undershoot the savings a Tesla Semi will achieve (they estimated diesel at $2.50 a gallon!), but suffice to say, businesses usually undershoot their claims or donít make them at all. Iím sure DHL did the math when it said it expects to recover the premium on these trucks within 1.5 years.

Besides: Tesla is selling this product directly to a group of people like me who are going to run the numbers every which way and figure out if this is cheaper to use. Lying to us is a bad idea. Lie to us on something that is an open-and-shut false advertising case at your own peril.

There is still at least one mystery ó it seems a battery breakthrough occurred. Iím banking on that already being true.

Before you read an(other) article that says that the batteries for the Semi and the Roadster are an aspirational goal that Tesla probably wonít hit, remember that Tesla started taking pre-orders for the Roadster at the exact same time. Something is up, or else Tesla just opened itself up for more false advertising claims, and those who can drop $50,000 to pre-order a car are in a group Iíd not want to anger either.

If Tesla staked its future on aspirational claims, it is doing it with the two most dangerous groups. I tend to believe the pattern will hold, and the Tesla Semi is real, and it truly is a Beast. A Beast that is ready to save a lot of money.

But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou
hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. Acts 8:20


+-Recent Topics

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 06:31:21 pm

Batteries by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 05:34:33 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 05:06:05 pm

Fossil Fuel Profits Getting Eaten Alive by Renewable Energy! by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 04:18:13 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 04:15:30 pm

Money by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 03:44:45 pm

Key Historical Events ...THAT YOU MAY HAVE NEVER HEARD OF by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 03:35:07 pm

🦕🦖 Hydrocarbon 🐍 Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus modus operandi by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 01:17:53 pm

Doomstead Diner Daily by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 01:08:40 pm

Fossil Fuel Subsidies - The Invisible Ones are Worse Than the Obvious Ones! by AGelbert
August 21, 2019, 12:09:16 pm