Author Topic: Blasts from the 2012 to 2013 past when there was more HOPE 🌟 (Read 3531 times)

AGelbert · « **Reply #105 on:** July 17, 2018, 04:31:57 pm »

Agelbert NOTE: It is no surprise to me that the link to the Scientific American Article which described the path to 100% Renewable Energy by 2030 is dead. The Hydrocarbom Hellspawn

never stop their skullduggery.

The link to the Budischak, et al study at the end of the article is still good. 🕵️

Quote from: agelbert on April 24, 2013, 08:27:17 pm

It's more than clear that we could supply 100% of our energy needs from renewable sources. Jacobson and Delucchi did that bit of math in 2009.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-path-to-sustainable-energy-by-2030

Solar, alone, provides far more harvest-able energy than we can conceive of using.

We know that we can run major grids using nothing but renewable energy. Budischak, et al. ran the numbers for the largest wholesale grid in the world. Diensendorf, et al. did the same for all of Australia.

While Jacobson and Delucchi showed that the energy was available and we have the technology needed to harvest it, these other studies have shown that it would be practical to use renewables for our energy needs.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/1NrBZJejkUTRYJv5YE__kBFuecdDL2pDTvKLyBjfCPr_8yR7eCTDhLGm8oEPo/edit

Renewable Revolution

User

Stats ezBlock

Author Topic: Blasts from the 2012 to 2013 past when there was more HOPE 🌟 (Read 3531 times)

AGelbert

Re: Blasts from the 2012 to 2013 past when there was more HOPE 🌟

Recent Topics