+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 38
Latest: Dave Pugner
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 6853
Total Topics: 207
Most Online Today: 2
Most Online Ever: 48
(June 03, 2014, 03:09:30 am)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 0
Total: 1

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Climate Change / Re: Future Earth
« Last post by AGelbert on Today at 06:59:11 pm »
Will We Grow Tall?

Will food really be grown in tall terraced towers in the middle of town in the future? Can there be truly sustainable cities that produce all of their own food?

 This video is a brilliant visual collage of photographs and artist renderings of vertical farms and futuristic green cities.

 Remember, it must first be imagined before it can be created- so let's keep imagining any and all possibilities for growing food locally.

 That goes for right now-- and into the future!

 --Bibi Farber

2
100 YEARS of USING Puerto Rico for cannon fodder, only to try to deport one now!

Here's a history lesson for you.

100 years ago the US President, who had campaigned on keeping the US OUT of the war, was actively planning to get the US INTO WWI. But they needed cannon fodder for that "war to end all wars".

By an amazing coincidence, the Jones–Shafroth Act made the people of Puerto Rico into "US Citizens" (who could NOT elect their own governor or vote in presidential elections - but COULD "serve in the military" LOL!). And almost immediately after that, the US entered WWI.

"On March 2, 1917, the Jones–Shafroth Act was signed, collectively making Puerto Ricans United States citizens without rescinding their Puerto Rican citizenship."

"On April 6, 1917, the U.S. joined its allies--Britain, France, and Russia--to fight in World War I. Under the command of Major General John J. Pershing, more than 2 million U.S. soldiers fought on battlefields in France. Many Americans were not in favor of the U.S. entering the war and wanted to remain neutral."

The IRONY of all this is that recently Trump's ICE tried to DEPORT a Puerto Rican to Mexico! It's BIGOTRY and RACISM, pure and simple, that most Americans do not want to admit is behind all this "property rights" and "border control" BULLSHIT, never mind the hypocrisy of sucking up cannon fodder hither and yon, only to double cross them later.

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/ice_reportedly_detains_undocumented_immigrant_on_his_18th_birthday_20170429


3
Holy ****.

This turned up in my Twitter feed, then I went to the photojournalist's blog.

ANTI FASCIST PROTEST OF WHITE SUPREMACIST RALLY IN PIKEVILLE, KENTUCKY

There is a writer named Elizabeth Mika who has come closest I have found to nailing this phenomenon:

It is no accident that the most enthusiastic Trumpists can be found among the manospherians, alt-righters and neo-Nazis: white men (usually) with a deficient conscience and a permanent sense of hurt and their own, so far unrecognized (but that’s gonna change soon!), specialness. They feel victimized by their own fears, at least some of which come from having to share the planet and human rights with the groups that were previously denied them, something they consider both a personal insult and grave threat to their existence. These are the men who live with the specter of white genocide taking place under the feminazi totalitarianism, in their minds already in progress in America. They come from among the spite voters, a large and largely unrecognized voting bloc brilliantly described by Mark Ames — in 2004 — as affected with the Middle American malice:

Spite voting is mostly a white male phenomenon, which is why a majority of white males vote Republican. It comes from a toxic mix of thwarted expectations, cowardice, shame, and a particular strain of anomie that is unique to the white American male experience.

More here:
https://medium.com/@Elamika/trumpian-victory-or-the-avengers-fractured-song-6ebe51aa0cc9


Thank you for this article. The issue of the REALITY of racism that NEVER WENT AWAY in the South is something most white Southerners just cannot accept as anything other than "liberal" or "leftist" propaganda.

Here is a snippet of a scientific study that confirms the worse fears about the continuing systemic nature of the racist culture in the South (of course we have it in the north too, but NOT to the same level of entrenchment).
 
Other People’s Racism: Race, Rednecks, and Riots in a Southern High School

Jessica Halliday Hardie1 and Karolyn Tyson2

Abstract

This article uses data drawn from nine months of fieldwork and student, teacher, and administrator interviews at a southern high school to analyze school racial conflict and the construction of racism. We find that institutional inequalities that stratify students by race and class are routinely ignored by school actors who, we argue, use the presence of so-called redneck students to plausibly deny racism while furthering the standard definition of racism as blatant prejudice and an individual trait. The historical prominence of rednecks as a southern cultural identity augments these claims, leading to an implicit division of school actors into friendly/nonracist and unfriendly/racist and allowing school actors to set boundaries on the meaning of racism. Yet these rhetorical practices and the institutional structures they mask contributed to racial tensions, culminating in a race riot during our time at the school.

Keywords: race, high schools, tracking, qualitative, racism


The week of February 5, 2007, may have been like any other at North Carolina’s Cordington High School had it not been for the race riot. According to student and teacher accounts, it began early in the week when a black student overheard a white “redneck” student say, “Let’s go lynch some ‘n*****s.”’1 Subsequently, rumors spread, first that the redneck students were planning to jump a black student in the hallway and then that a black male was going to bring a gun to school. Sheriff’s deputies were called in, and teachers were put on high alert. As stories of a major fight between rednecks and blacks and plans to “shoot up the school” circulated, tensions mounted. School officials attempted to quell fears by identifying and punishing the students involved in the incident (both redneck and black students) and using the automated telephone messaging system to inform parents that the incident had been resolved and everything was “under control.” Still, three days after the initial incident, on the Friday on which the rumored confrontation between blacks and whites was to occur, more than half the students skipped school or were kept home by their parents. Although there was no evidence that any physical fights or violence actually occurred on or away from school grounds as a result of the incident, it was nonetheless variously referred to by students and faculty during informal conversations and interviews as a “riot,” “race riot,” “redneck riot,” and “brawl.”

This incident, which occurred while we were conducting a study examining how law and authority affect school actors at more than 20 schools, brought into stark relief the unfinished business of racial reconciliation in the South. The southern United States is an important region in which to study race relations among youth and school racial conflict. Racial confrontations occur regularly in schools across the country, but the one that occurred in North Carolina involved symbols of racism and racial violence and intimidation tied to the Old South. Nor was it the only incident of racial unrest we heard about during our research. At another North Carolina high school, we learned from students and administrators about a race riot (this one with actual fighting) triggered by tensions about Confederate clothing worn by rednecks (as they were called by other students and faculty alike) and counter-Confederate clothing (declaring that the South will never rise again) worn by blacks in response.2 School officials also reported a dispute about a Confederate flag at Cordington a few years prior to our study. Similar to the incident in Jena, Louisiana, in 2007, in which a vicious fight broke out between black and white students after nooses were found hanging from a tree in the schoolyard,3 these incidents highlight the endurance of racist symbols and racial hostility between blacks and whites in the South. Yet unlike the Jena case, most racial incidents receive little attention outside of the communities in which they take place, leaving few opportunities for systematic analysis of the underlying factors and meaning making surrounding these conflicts.

Furthermore, most recent studies documenting racial tensions and fights among students were conducted in ethnically and racially diverse schools in the West and Northeast (e.g., Bettie 2003; Lee 1996; Morrill and Musheno 2009; Perry 2002; Staiger 2006). In those accounts, the group conflicts were usually between two or more nonwhite groups, reflecting the changing demographics of those regions. The South presents a different landscape. Despite large-scale demographic shifts introducing Hispanic migrants (Lippard and Gallagher 2011; Wahl and Gunkel 2007), blacks and whites still make up the vast majority of the population in North Carolina, at 22 and 65 percent, respectively (U.S. Census 2011).4 Moreover, cultural symbols and images (e.g., nooses, lynching, Confederate flags) of the old slave-holding and segregated South dot the landscape of North Carolina. Schools are no exception. Indeed, some of these symbols, particularly the Confederate flag, were ever present at Cordington and the cause of much tension. This context is important because it presents a unique opportunity to examine racial dynamics in an environment of blatant, overt racism, which is less common today than in the past. Few contemporary studies have assessed how these dynamics play out in schools in the South. Thus, we heed Morris and Monroe’s (2009) call for more attention to place in social science research, particularly as it relates to the educational experience.

In this article, we examine the social and institutional factors that make race meaningful for youth in schools and how they contribute to racial hostility and conflict. We are particularly interested in how school actors construct and respond to racism. At Cordington, issues of race and racism were apparent throughout the school in observations and formal and informal interviews before and after the riot; thus, the incident is just a touchstone for examining these issues. We find that as in other parts of the country, institutional practices (e.g., tracking) and the social organization of students (i.e., cliques) strengthen racial and class identities within schools. However, the presence of southern rednecks, a group historically defined as synonymous with racism, serves an important ideological function. While redneck students clearly contributed to racial hostilities at Cordington, this population of students was frequently cast as the only culprit of racism at the school. This communicated a shared understanding of racism as an individual trait and overt action. However, as conceptualized by Bonilla-Silva (1997; 2003) and others (Chesler, Lewis, and Crowfoot 2005; Wellman 1994), racism is an ideology that supports a racialized social system that rewards racial groups unequally across a number of domains. Such a system was evident at Cordington in tracking and, according to students of color, disciplinary practices, yet school actors ignored the symptoms of racism and the racialized social structure in favor of placing the blame for racism on the rednecks. Thus, not only could others point to rednecks to deny any racism on their own part (e.g., “I’m not like that”), but the group’s behavior also drew attention away from and helped mask racist structures within the school. In total, both the blatant aggression of the rednecks and the more passive, but powerful, institutionalized racial structure contributed to racial inequality at Cordington.

We argue that similar to test scores and other evaluative criteria to which Americans often point to deny structural components of racial inequality, Cordington’s rednecks were a means to “plausibly deny” racism (Liu and Mills 2006; van Dijk 1992). Our findings show that “plausible deniability of racism” is achieved not only through discourse, as in “the rhetorical moves” speakers use to defend their words as not racist, as European and Oceanic scholars have found (Liu and Mills 2006:83; Simmons and Lecouter 2008), but through objects as well, things or people to which one can point to provide a plausible alternative explanation to institutional racism or to deflect charges of individual racism.

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Continue reading a truly objective analysis of Southern systemic racism at link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662232/

Agelbert NOTE: IOW, it's NOT "just the rednecks". It's the SYSTEMIC INSTITUTIONALIZED RACISM! The rednecks are just the EXCUSE the educated BIGOTS use to disingenuously make the following claim over and over:

Quote
"Only ignorant and low IQ rednecks AND blacks engage in racism".


 

4
Who CAN you trust? / Re: Corruption in Government
« Last post by AGelbert on Today at 05:09:33 pm »
I ran into this and am displaying it here in the hope that the any Trump supporters will be bent out of shape by the TRUTH (again   ;D).
Trump’s First 99 Days in 99 Seconds

Posted on Apr 29, 2017

Saturday marks the 100th day of Donald Trump’s presidency, and comedians have been quick to point out how the first few months “sure felt longer.” On Friday, “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” released a humorous, 99-second summary of Trump’s first 99 days in office.

The summary includes some of the biggest moments of the Trump administration so far, such as Kellyanne Conway’s infamous “alternative facts” moment, the firing of acting Attorney General Sally Yates, the controversial departure of national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump’s allegation of wiretapping by Barack Obama, and, most importantly, golf.

Watch the clip below:


—Posted by Emma Niles

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/stephen_colbert_sums_up_first_99_days_of_trump_administration_in_99_seconds
5


Jeff Sessions is no Confederate General, even though he might be named for one.

Conflating the likes of him with real dead war heroes is the kind of senseless re-organization of facts, feelings and bullshit  that has resulted in the false narrative that passes for Civil War history.

No one who didn't live in the South during Reconstruction can really understand why all those monuments were built. The people who built them are all dead, and the people who have a problem with them are completely clueless as to why they exist. Certainly, some unemployed Hollywood writer with a Twitter account  like Tom Ceraulo, has no standing when it comes to weighing in on the subject.

Like you do? You lived through reconstruction?

Part of the perpetuation of the mystique with all things Confederate is the endless romanticization of the "Lost Cause" by generations of writers who have lobbied in the courts of public opinion for what they could not win on the battlefield. Not having it.

Let us be **** clear. Allow me to acquaint you with VP of the Confederacy Alexander Stephens and his Cornerstone Speech, which became so known for Stephens's declaration that the perpetuation of slavery was the principal goal and purpose of the secession and the Confederacy:

"Our new government is founded upon exactly [this] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth."

Here’s what William Thompson said about the Confederate flag, and we should listen, since he was the one who created not only its design but its symbolism and purpose. Here he is quoted in the book Our Flag, by George Preble:


As a people we are fighting to maintain the heavenly ordained supremacy of the white man over the inferior or colored race; a white flag would thus be emblematical of our cause.

Confederate monuments should be relocated to museums or memorial parks. They, like the battle flag, offend the living f u c k out of me.

     
6
Who CAN you trust? / Re: Corruption in Government
« Last post by AGelbert on Today at 04:18:39 pm »

Rick Friday has been giving farmers a voice and a laugh every Friday for two decades through his cartoons in Farm News.   
Now the long-time Iowa farm cartoonist tells KCCI that he has been fired.
Friday announced Sunday that his job was over after 21 years in a Facebook post that has since gone viral.
FACEBOOK POST:
"Again, I fall hard in the best interest of large corporations. I am no longer the Editorial Cartoonist for Farm News due to the attached cartoon which was published yesterday. Apparently a large company affiliated with one of the corporations mentioned in the cartoon was insulted and cancelled their advertisement with the paper, thus, resulting in the reprimand of my editor and cancellation of its Friday cartoons after 21 years of service and over 1,090 published cartoons to over 24,000 households per week in 33 counties of Iowa.
"I did my research and only submitted the facts in my cartoon.
"That's okay, hopefully my children and my grandchildren will see that this last cartoon published by Farm News out of Fort Dodge, Iowa, will shine light on how fragile our rights to free speech and free press really are in the county."
THE CARTOON:
The cartoon features two farmers talking about farming profits. (view cartoon)
The first says, "I wish there was more profit in farming."
The second farm answers, "There is. In year 2015 the CEOs of Monsanto, DuPont Pioneer and John Deere combined made more money than 2,129 Iowa farmers.
Friday received an email from his editor at Farm New cutting off their relationship a day after the cartoon was published.
Friday’s editor said a seed dealer pulled their advertisements with Farm News as a result of the cartoon, and others working at the paper disagreed with the jokes made about the agriculture corporations.
“When it comes to altering someone’s opinion or someone’s voice for the purpose of wealth, I have a problem with that,” said Friday. “It’s our constitutional right to free speech and our constitutional right to free press.”

***

To which I must add:

Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one. --AJ Liebling

The way it works in this country.....and everywhere else, as best I can tell. We are ruled by evil greedy men who gladly poison their own grandchildren in order to accumulate money they don't even need, and in fact will never spend. Something is amiss with this business model.

Yep. Something is VERY amiss when Human Dignity is not considered Capital. That something will destroy absolutely everything good that humanity has ever accomplished if it is not somehow properly demonized and banished forever from human society.


I would add to AZ's very accurate graphic the following message to the "Greed is Good" Trump and vampire parasite friends:

7
100 YEARS of USING Puerto Rico for cannon fodder, only to try to deport one now!

Here's a history lesson for you.

100 years ago the US President, who had campaigned on keeping the US OUT of the war, was actively planning to get the US INTO WWI. But they needed cannon fodder for that "war to end all wars".

By an amazing coincidence, the Jones–Shafroth Act made the people of Puerto Rico into "US Citizens" (who could NOT elect their own governor or vote in presidential elections - but COULD "serve in the military" LOL!). And almost immediately after that, the US entered WWI.

"On March 2, 1917, the Jones–Shafroth Act was signed, collectively making Puerto Ricans United States citizens without rescinding their Puerto Rican citizenship."

"On April 6, 1917, the U.S. joined its allies--Britain, France, and Russia--to fight in World War I. Under the command of Major General John J. Pershing, more than 2 million U.S. soldiers fought on battlefields in France. Many Americans were not in favor of the U.S. entering the war and wanted to remain neutral."

The IRONY of all this is that recently Trump's ICE tried to DEPORT a Puerto Rican to Mexico! It's BIGOTRY and RACISM, pure and simple, that most Americans do not want to admit is behind all this "property rights" and "border control" BULLSHIT, never mind the hypocrisy of sucking up cannon fodder hither and yon, only to double cross them later.

http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/ice_reportedly_detains_undocumented_immigrant_on_his_18th_birthday_20170429


8
Who CAN you trust? / Re: Corruption in Government
« Last post by AGelbert on Today at 02:18:49 pm »
Quote
Do you think President Trump is a psychopath?

Kevin Carothers

Kevin Carothers, NOT a therapist, but I can try to help

Written Apr 25

I have had experiences with narcissistic sociopaths. I was married to one for about 15 years - she tried to kill me a couple times..

Here’s my take on the situation - 100 days later. Trump is, IMHO, POSSIBLY a narcissist. He also might be a psychopath.

According to the Richard Hare checklist, the twenty warning signs in the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) are;

•glib and superficial charm

•grandiose (exaggeratedly high) estimation of self

•need for stimulation

•pathological lying

•cunning and manipulativeness

•lack of remorse or guilt

•shallow affect (superficial emotional responsiveness)

•callousness and lack of empathy

•parasitic lifestyle

•poor behavioral controls

•sexual promiscuity

•early behavior problems

•lack of realistic long-term goals

•impulsivity

•irresponsibility

•failure to accept responsibility for own actions

•many short-term marital relationships

•juvenile delinquency

•revocation of conditional release

•criminal versatility

…Sounds like someone we might know…. 

Hare Psychopathy Checklist

DISCLAIMER: This is just a repeat of information - I am not a psychologist.


https://www.quora.com/

9
Wonders of Nature / Re: Large Sea Creatures
« Last post by AGelbert on Today at 01:48:26 pm »
Attack this lady's friends or offspring, you should not.

Are Humpback Whales Aggressive? ???

In the past 62 years, there have been 115 documented interactions between humpback whales and orcas (also known as killer whales), according to a 2016 study published in the journal Marine Mammal Science.

Quote
Agelbert NOTE: Below, please observe a smart seal taking advantage of the friendly Humpback Limo service.   


A photographer documenting a pod of whales in Australia took this photo of a seal hitching a ride on a humpback whale. (KGO-TV)

Reports have described humpbacks defending animals being attacked by orcas, from seals and sea lions to porpoises and other marine mammals.

Yep, Humpback whales are fast friends with Ocean Sunfish. ;D

There was one documented incident in which humpback whales tried to save a pair of ocean sunfish that were being circled by orcas.

  We Humpbacks do NOT get along with Orcas AT ALL.

And in May 2012, in the most dramatic event of this kind, two humpbacks spent six hours fighting off a pod of killer whales intent on eating a gray whale calf they had killed near Monterey Bay, California.

Heroes of the seas? 

•“This humpback whale behavior continues to happen in multiple areas throughout the world,” says Alisa Schulman-Janiger of the California Killer Whale Project. “(The 2012 event) remains the longest humpback-to-killer-whale interaction known to date.”

•Orcas are known to attack humpbacks, which are most vulnerable when young. However, once grown, a single humpback whale is large enough to take on an entire pod of killer whales.

Humpbacks are capable of sophisticated thinking, decision-making, problem-solving, and communication, says Lori Marino, president of the Whale Sanctuary Project.

http://www.wisegeek.com/are-humpback-whales-aggressive.htm

10
Nuke Puke / Re: Nuclear Poisoning of the Pacific
« Last post by AGelbert on April 29, 2017, 11:26:00 pm »
Experts: Japan “wants to just drop tanks” of Fukushima nuclear waste into ocean Americans worried over plumes hitting West Coast — “Reactors are now leaking really high levels of radiation into sea… The world does need to help” — Official says Japan lying about catastrophe  (VIDEO)

 Published: April 26th, 2017 at 10:19 am ET

By ENENews

233 comments



http://enenews.com/experts-japan-wants-to-just-drop-tanks-of-fukushima-nuclear-waste-into-ocean-americans-worried-over-plumes-hitting-west-coast-reactors-are-now-leaking-really-high-levels-of-radiation-into
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

+-Recent Topics

Future Earth by AGelbert
Today at 06:59:11 pm

Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden by AGelbert
Today at 06:27:23 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
Today at 05:09:33 pm

Large Sea Creatures by AGelbert
Today at 01:48:26 pm

Nuclear Poisoning of the Pacific by AGelbert
April 29, 2017, 11:26:00 pm

Non-routine News by AGelbert
April 29, 2017, 05:13:29 pm

Sustainable Food Production by AGelbert
April 29, 2017, 05:01:14 pm

Member Interesting, Hair Raising, Humorous or Otherwise Unusual Experiences by AGelbert
April 29, 2017, 04:38:49 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
April 28, 2017, 02:21:05 pm

Fossil Fuels: Degraded Democracy and Profit Over Planet Pollution by AGelbert
April 27, 2017, 08:54:18 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial