+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 44
Latest: Robinquit
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 11402
Total Topics: 251
Most Online Today: 3
Most Online Ever: 52
(November 29, 2017, 04:04:44 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 0
Total: 0

Author Topic: Darwin  (Read 6908 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19044
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
It seems that NEANDERTHAL APPEARANCE is "Evolving". LOL!
« Reply #30 on: December 24, 2013, 01:57:22 am »
Well this is interesting.  ;)

Here's the Neanderthal facial "reconstruction" we are used to seeing in the press:




Now look at the Neanderthal facial reconstruction in this recent article.  :o It seems that they have DECIDED this fine fellow had a bigger nose and chin. And they call this "SCIENCE"?


Quote




A reconstruction of a Neanderthal face. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 Tim Evanson

 
Scientists have come up with a list of the genes that distinguish us from our prehistoric cousins.

 Humans may be the dominant species on the planet today, but thousands of years ago our ancestors shared the Earth with the Neanderthals, a species very similar to modern humans but that would ultimately die out despite being very close to us both physically and intellectually.

In an effort to learn more about what set us apart, scientists have been identifying specific genes that distinguish modern humans from Neanderthals. In particular, researchers have been keen to learn which changes might have been instrumental in enabling our dominance over the planet.

The research was made possible thanks to a project founded in 2006 that aimed to sequence the entire Neanderthal genome. The team managed to do this by extracting DNA from a 50,000-year-old Neanderthal toe bone discovered in the mountains of Siberia.

"We are quite confident that among these genetic changes lie the basis for the interesting differences between modern humans and Neanderthals," said geneticist Janet Kelso.

     

  Source: The Guardian

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/259632/what-makes-us-different-to-neanderthals

Well, at least the professional archeologists have come to the same conclusion I did (Neanderthals had a nose and a chin VERY much like Homo Sapiens). In fact, you couldn't tell this fellow above from some of our larger human specimens, now could you? The trick is angling the skull. If you rotate it FORWARD, it looks more human. If you rotate it BACK, it looks less human (assumed more sloping forehead).

Let's be clear. They DO NOT know exactly how their head sat on their neck. Ape heads sit forward of ours. I think they made that SAME assumption about Neanderthals as they do for apes instead of humans and that is why they pushed the MISSING LINK scam with some "appearance" justification.

NOW they are forced to admit these people were pretty intelligent. So low and behold, the face starts to look more like Homo SAP! 


It's a nut house of facial reconstructions out there right now!

http://www.thesubversivearchaeologist.com/2011/11/nose-to-nose-thine-neanderthal-eye-in.html

And it gets BETTER! They have discovered proof that Neanderthals BURIED THEIR DEAD in addition to using stone tools! You know what? I think they are US! Just like domesticated dogs are quite different from wolves, that explains the differences. Not that the evolutionary true believers would accept that, of course. But, but, they were shorter and stockier!! Uh, I guess pygmies aren't HUMAN, right?  ;) There wasn't a lot of travel. Inbreeding DOES that sort of thing. We have lots of proof of that in modern history!

Do you want some more proof that morphology can change radically without evolution? The Spaniards lost some domesticated pigs in what is now the USA in the 16th century that, without breeding with any other animal or changing their DNA, grew tusks and increased in size and ferocity in the wild and became WILD BOARS! Google it if you don't believe it!

As mankind had a more domesticated and less violent existence, he, like the domesticated dogs and goats and pigs, adapted with a softer appearance in less robust skull. If you don't believe that is possible, then WHY do you think the moment and astronaut gets into zero G, his body tries to get rid of his calcium? What would a human baby, with the SAME DNA (no evolution whatsoever) look like that was born and raised in Zero G? RADICALLY DIFFERENT!

The adaptation mechanisms in our DNA package are incredibly underrated by modern science for no other reason than the assumption that we "evolved" from some monstrous and semi-intelligent brute.

Well, if you had to live in ice age conditions and fought bears and mammoths, you might not be exactly a tender hearted fellow with good table manners. In fact, only the meanest, baddest, strongest males would survive. And they probably, as you can see by their skulls, were pretty fierce fellows. How do we KNOW they "died out" because WE "replaced" them? I've seen wrestlers that look more primitive than these Neanderthals! There is, even now that we are all a bunch of softies because of technology, and amazing amount of variation in human skull morphology. So much so, in fact, that some racists archeologists have tried to establish with measurements and angles that Africans are "less evolved" than Caucasians! BULLshit!

You don't believe me? Check this out:

Quote



Erectus Walks


Amongst Us

The evolution of modern humans
by


Richard D. Fuerle


Spooner Press, NY

Copyright 2008


ISBN 978-1-60458-121-8


Printed in the United States by Lightning Source

http://erectuswalksamongst.us/

If you are the least bit racist, you will LOVE the way this guy, a scientist, mind you, twists science to push racism. 

He DELIBERATELY angles skulls to make Africans look more ape like and Caucasians more "beautiful" (his words! when describing forehead slopes angles and such.). He measures something to do with the protrusion of the teeth below the nose and the width of the jaw to claim Africans are more ape-like than Caucasians by showing some drawings from the ape to an African to a Caucasian jaw. The pictures of skulls of Africans, Asians and Caucasians look normal except the African skull has exaggerated features. I would not be surprised if he altered the picture to make the African skull look more ape like.
 

There are a lot of very SICK racists out there. A lot of them are scientists. Some of them are archeologists like the low life that wrote the above book.  >:(

Just because a SCIENTIST said it, doesn't not mean you should BELIEVE IT!
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
Faith,
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

 

+-Recent Topics

The Wisdom of the Books of the Bible by AGelbert
February 17, 2019, 01:45:30 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
February 16, 2019, 01:49:01 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
February 15, 2019, 01:54:57 pm

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
February 15, 2019, 01:43:48 pm

Money by AGelbert
February 14, 2019, 08:22:30 pm

Defending Wildlife by AGelbert
February 14, 2019, 04:04:46 pm

Rick Simpson's Hemp Oil by AGelbert
February 10, 2019, 01:22:30 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
February 08, 2019, 12:04:00 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
February 07, 2019, 07:09:38 pm

Corporate Profits over Patient in the Health Care Field by AGelbert
February 07, 2019, 02:21:35 pm