Renewable Revolution

RE,
Your assumption that human life BEGAN MILLIONS of YEARS AGO lacks even a shred of scientific evidence. How can you so blithely come out with such assumptions?     Spare me the "any moron knows we evolved to be humans millions of years ago" consensus scientific world view. I'm painfully aware of it. It's not science (evidence) based. It's half baked conjecture. Try arguing the merits instead of pulling the "everybody knows" business on me, godfader.   

Darwin is on MY SIDE of this anti-evolution argument!   

 If Darwin was alive today, he would be arguing AGAINST the validity of the Theory of Evolution! 
2 minute video on the probability of single celled life occuring randomly
http://viewrz.com/video/single-celled-life-probability
4 minute video on cell complexity
http://viewrz.com/video/cell-complexity

For ANYBODY here that thinks SET (Standard Evolutionary Theory) does NOT need to be SEVERELY revised, to put it mildly, here's a brief review of the scientific method as summarized CORRECTLY by Eddie, a scientist in his own right:

Observation, hypothesis, proof.

All else is bullshitting around the campfire.

THAT is how it works. After the EVIDENCE (proof) is INSUFFICIENT to confirm the original hypothesis, or CONTRADICTS the original hypothesis, THEN a scientist MUST revise or DISCARD the hypothesis!

If you insist on clinging to a good story sans evidence, you are not doing science, you are doing consensus groupthink. Have a nice day.