+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 46
Latest: Tony Ryan
New This Month: 2
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 12120
Total Topics: 254
Most Online Today: 1
Most Online Ever: 137
(April 21, 2019, 04:54:01 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: How the Promise of Chemurgy Was Dashed by Big Oil  (Read 1857 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21806
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
How Ronald Reagan Turned Out the Lights on Solar Power
« on: October 17, 2013, 07:37:34 pm »
How Ronald Reagan Turned Out the Lights on Solar Power  >:(
 
In an excerpt from his new book, John Perlin reveals how one of the first actions of the new Reagan administration was to dim the lights on the solar energy program.


SNIPPET:

Dr. Barry Commoner, a distinguished scientist and strong solar advocate, was “surprised and troubled by the smallness of both the proposed solar research budget and expected results.” He wanted to see the data from the National Science Foundation that supported the Atomic Energy Commission’s dismal view of the future of solar power, especially since Solar Subpanel IX, the scientific panel that appraised photovoltaics’ contribution, was made up of, in Commoner’s judgment, “a distinguished group of experts.” A report by Solar Subpanel IX contained their findings, the scientist learned; when Commoner asked to see a copy of the report, the Nixon administration denied that such a report existed. Not believing the response credible, Commoner enlisted the support of Senator James Abourezk of South Dakota, a strong supporter of solar energy.

He received the same runaround. Finally, a solar-energy friendly “Deep Throat” told the senator that a copy existed and could be found at the Atomic Energy Commission’s document reading room. According to Commoner, “This turned out to be a dim photocopy of a hazy carbon; but it has brilliantly illuminated” the discrepancies between the science and politics of energy.

Unlike the author of The Nation’s Energy Future, the subpanel recommended an outlay of almost six times more money than the Atomic Energy Commission had requested for research and development of solar cells. Furthermore, the National Science Foundation had great expectations for solar electricity, predicting that with its suggested outlay of funds for photovoltaics, solar cells would supply “more than 7 percent of the required U.S. electrical generation capacity by the year 2000,” even though the expenditure for the solar option would be 16 times less than for the nuclear choice.

The subpanel also found the solar option more appealing because “in contrast to problems incurred by nuclear plants, photovoltaic systems would find wide public acceptance because of their minimal impact on the environment.” However, the report warned, if underfunded, “photovoltaics will not impact the energy [situation]” in future times.



http://www.alternet.org/how-ronald-reagan-turned-out-lights-solar-power
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
Faith,
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

 

+-Recent Topics

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
May 18, 2019, 05:38:41 pm

Doomstead Diner Daily by AGelbert
May 18, 2019, 03:27:35 pm

🦕🦖 Hydrocarbon 🐍 Hellspawn Mens Rea Actus Reus modus operandi by AGelbert
May 18, 2019, 01:01:27 pm

Viruses of the Mind by AGelbert
May 17, 2019, 11:02:29 pm

The Anti-Democratic Elite Fix Was IN From The Very Start of the USA by AGelbert
May 17, 2019, 10:28:49 pm

Genocide by Surly1
May 16, 2019, 09:07:47 am

Global Warming is WITH US by Surly1
May 16, 2019, 07:39:36 am

U.S. History & Politics, Climate Change, Trump Impeachment & Standing Rock: CONTEXT by AGelbert
May 15, 2019, 05:29:08 pm

Carbon Neutral Buildings by AGelbert
May 15, 2019, 04:23:03 pm

Corporate Profits over Patient in the Health Care Field by AGelbert
May 15, 2019, 04:08:14 pm