+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 51
Latest: JUST4TheFACTS
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 14961
Total Topics: 261
Most Online Today: 38
Most Online Ever: 201
(December 08, 2019, 11:34:38 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 9
Total: 9

Author Topic: How the Promise of Chemurgy Was Dashed by Big Oil  (Read 2031 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31819
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
How Ronald Reagan Turned Out the Lights on Solar Power
« on: October 17, 2013, 07:37:34 pm »
How Ronald Reagan Turned Out the Lights on Solar Power  >:(
 
In an excerpt from his new book, John Perlin reveals how one of the first actions of the new Reagan administration was to dim the lights on the solar energy program.


SNIPPET:

Dr. Barry Commoner, a distinguished scientist and strong solar advocate, was “surprised and troubled by the smallness of both the proposed solar research budget and expected results.” He wanted to see the data from the National Science Foundation that supported the Atomic Energy Commission’s dismal view of the future of solar power, especially since Solar Subpanel IX, the scientific panel that appraised photovoltaics’ contribution, was made up of, in Commoner’s judgment, “a distinguished group of experts.” A report by Solar Subpanel IX contained their findings, the scientist learned; when Commoner asked to see a copy of the report, the Nixon administration denied that such a report existed. Not believing the response credible, Commoner enlisted the support of Senator James Abourezk of South Dakota, a strong supporter of solar energy.

He received the same runaround. Finally, a solar-energy friendly “Deep Throat” told the senator that a copy existed and could be found at the Atomic Energy Commission’s document reading room. According to Commoner, “This turned out to be a dim photocopy of a hazy carbon; but it has brilliantly illuminated” the discrepancies between the science and politics of energy.

Unlike the author of The Nation’s Energy Future, the subpanel recommended an outlay of almost six times more money than the Atomic Energy Commission had requested for research and development of solar cells. Furthermore, the National Science Foundation had great expectations for solar electricity, predicting that with its suggested outlay of funds for photovoltaics, solar cells would supply “more than 7 percent of the required U.S. electrical generation capacity by the year 2000,” even though the expenditure for the solar option would be 16 times less than for the nuclear choice.

The subpanel also found the solar option more appealing because “in contrast to problems incurred by nuclear plants, photovoltaic systems would find wide public acceptance because of their minimal impact on the environment.” However, the report warned, if underfunded, “photovoltaics will not impact the energy [situation]” in future times.



http://www.alternet.org/how-ronald-reagan-turned-out-lights-solar-power
Rob not the poor, because he is poor: neither oppress the afflicted in the gate:
For the Lord will plead their cause, and spoil the soul of those that spoiled them. Pr. 22:22-23

 

+-Recent Topics

🚩 Global Climate Chaos ☠️ by AGelbert
January 26, 2020, 09:07:56 pm

Doomstead Diner Daily by Surly1
January 26, 2020, 09:31:41 am

2020 Presidential Election by AGelbert
January 26, 2020, 12:08:52 am

Profiles in Courage by AGelbert
January 25, 2020, 06:18:12 pm

War Provocations and Peace Actions by AGelbert
January 25, 2020, 04:39:27 pm

Pollution by AGelbert
January 25, 2020, 04:27:03 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
January 25, 2020, 03:57:00 pm

Non-routine News by Surly1
January 25, 2020, 07:15:58 am

“It is now 100 seconds to midnight.” by Surly1
January 25, 2020, 06:59:03 am

Money by AGelbert
January 24, 2020, 08:02:28 pm