+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 42
Latest: eranda
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 9507
Total Topics: 234
Most Online Today: 0
Most Online Ever: 52
(November 29, 2017, 04:04:44 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 0
Total: 0

Author Topic: Fossil Fuel Propaganda Modus Operandi  (Read 8612 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9312
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • View Profile
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
Re: Fossil Fuel Propaganda Modus Operandi
« Reply #180 on: February 22, 2018, 03:00:11 pm »
 

February 21, 2018

Make Nexus Hot News part of your morning: click here to subscribe.



Deniers 🦕 🦖 Rage
at Mann’s 🕊 AAAS Award for Public Engagement 🌟

Last week, climate scientist Dr. Michael E Mann🕊 was honored with the AAAS award for Public Engagement in Science.

Mann hardly needs an introduction here. Ever since the publication of his hockey stick study twenty years ago, Mann has been a central target of the denial machine. Deniers have attacked him with everything they’ve got: weaponized FOIAs, constant trolling, you name it. In 2010, as the FBI finished the investigation into anthrax-laced letters that killed five people in the early 2000s, someone sent Mann white powder in an envelope.

In his book on the Climate Wars, Mann describes how the denial apparatus singles out outspoken scientists and targets them for campaigns of harassment. Mann calls this the “Serengeti Strategy,” named for how pack hunters single out prey for an easy meal. But instead of gradually wearing down the subject until they give up, Mann has only gotten more attention from the press and more praise from his peers, all while continuing to publish regularly in the peer reviewed literature.

Instead of scaring Mann out of the public eye, deniers have only managed to elevate his profile.

It makes sense, then, that this award made deniers angry. They’re up in arms that Mann, who they’ve always tried to present as an outlier hated by his fellow scientists, is being thusly rewarded by his fellow scientists for exactly the behavior they’ve criticized.

Roger Pielke Jr. wrote that by awarding Mann this prize, AAAS sends a message that it’s okay to speak out about people like Pielke and his fellow “denier lites” like Bret Stephens, Rebekah Mercer, Megan McArdle and Judith Curry. Which is exactly what AAAS should be saying.

Scientists should feel not just comfortable, but obligated to correct those who use their platforms to continually make incorrect assertions about science, again and again. Scientists should correct the systematic distribution of misinformation and help inform the public of where, why and how that misinformation is being spread in the public discourse and relied on by politicians to enact anti-climate policies. Most importantly--and especially given the denial machine that attacks those who speak out on climate--academics should be supported in these education efforts by institutions like AAAS.

That, of course, is not how serial misinformers see things. Pielke’s post got tweeted by Bjorn Lomborg, excerpted by Delingpole at Breitbart and expanded on by The Federalist which was in turn reposted by Climate Depot, putting Pielke squarely in the center of the denial world’s feigned outrage machine.

To be fair, Pielke recognizes that human activity causes climate change, and even thinks a carbon tax would be the right policy to address it. But as former New York Times reporter turned New York Times columnist Justin Gillis tweeted, that’s just part of Pielke’s ploy for readership, which is why Gillis stopped quoting Pielke. “The schtick: Pretend to be part of the mainstream consensus about global warming, then draw attention to yourself by kneecapping other people,” Gillis explains. “It's an odious way to build personal brand. @BjornLomborg does it too.”

No surprise to see Lomborg 🦕 and Pielke 🦖 as two peas in a pod. And their response to Mann’s award continues to show that once you move beyond their token acceptance of mainstream climate science, their jealousy of Mann’s success will likely be as green as they ever go.
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
Faith,
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
50 Replies
3402 Views
Last post October 17, 2017, 03:13:27 pm
by AGelbert
210 Replies
4572 Views
Last post March 06, 2018, 09:46:13 pm
by AGelbert
84 Replies
2920 Views
Last post April 25, 2018, 06:58:50 pm
by AGelbert
31 Replies
3719 Views
Last post February 09, 2017, 07:20:24 pm
by AGelbert
165 Replies
4330 Views
Last post May 06, 2018, 04:03:19 pm
by AGelbert

+-Recent Topics

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
May 20, 2018, 10:02:03 pm

End Times according to the Judeo Christian Bible by AGelbert
May 20, 2018, 07:08:42 pm

Genocide by AGelbert
May 19, 2018, 08:21:29 pm

War Provocations and Peace Actions by AGelbert
May 19, 2018, 08:02:09 pm

Sustainable Farming by AGelbert
May 19, 2018, 07:29:35 pm

Member Interesting, Hair Raising, Humorous or Otherwise Unusual Experiences by AGelbert
May 19, 2018, 07:01:11 pm

The Fabulous Plant Kingdom by AGelbert
May 19, 2018, 01:14:53 pm

Healthy Eating by AGelbert
May 18, 2018, 09:32:00 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
May 18, 2018, 09:15:11 pm

Money by AGelbert
May 18, 2018, 06:35:19 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial