+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 41
Latest: GWarnock
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 8679
Total Topics: 228
Most Online Today: 5
Most Online Ever: 52
(November 29, 2017, 04:04:44 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: Fossil Fuel Propaganda Modus Operandi  (Read 6267 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8484
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • View Profile
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
Re: Fossil Fuel Propaganda Modus Operandi
« Reply #135 on: June 16, 2017, 09:07:24 pm »
 

New Denier Study So Bad Even Deniers are Somewhat Skeptical  :D

It goes without saying that peer review is an important safeguard against shoddy pseudoscience. Peer reviewers are so vital to the scientific endeavour that they recently got their own monument!
 
But peer review is not a perfect process. It’s necessary to ensure quality science, of course. but sometimes peer review goes wrong. For example, a journal whose editor is a climate denier with ties to Heartland recently published a paper claiming to refute the greenhouse theory. The paper is so bad that one scientist told DeSmog it is “laughable,” in part because the paper takes issue with the fact that greenhouses have glass roofs, and the atmosphere does not.   
 
Seriously.  ;D
 
So although deniers try to downplay the importance of the consensus to claim that a vast global conspiracy keeps their work out of peer-reviewed journals, it’s not impossible for their shoddy science to get published.
 
Most recently, Daily Caller’s Michael Bastasch,our favorite Koch operative masquerading as a reporter, covered a new study by “veteran statistician Stan Young” claiming to “expose huge flaws in EPA science.”  Surprisingly, Bastasch included a number of reasons to question the accuracy of the study. The post starts with an indication that Young’s study had been shopped around for three years before being peer-review published. Bastasch also includes a quote from reviewers who rejected the study from other journals, and a surprisingly lengthy section about the EPA’s decades-old establishment of the lethality of PM 2.5 pollution.
 
Bastasch mentions that the backstory on the struggle for this paper to pass peer review comes from a book, Scare Pollution . For some reason, he fails to mention that this book is written by Steve Milloy, the guy who wrote columns for Fox News until it was revealed that he was a tobacco industry lobbyist before becoming a fossil fuel booster. While Milloy does not appear to be an author of the study, he refers to it on his site JunkScience as “My California study” (the research is based on California health info).
 
The Milloy connection hints at the backstory behind the study, which is an attempt to debunk the seminal Six Cities study from Harvard that established the link between pollution and mortality. Because of its use by the EPA as a justification for regulations, the Six Cities study has long been a target for anti-EPA and pro-industry forces, particularly Lamar Smith.
 
While we haven’t yet dug into the details of the study, we hope some of you smart people do soon. It will likely make an appearance in Congress the next time someone wants to argue against EPA regulations. 
 
And when even their denier peers include multiple red flags about how it struggled to pass peer-review, it shouldn’t be too hard to debunk this study purporting to debunk decades of studies. 


https://www.desmogblog.com/2017/06/11/new-sham-journal-OMICS-climate-science-denier-ties-heartland-institute
Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
Faith,
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
50 Replies
2660 Views
Last post October 17, 2017, 03:13:27 pm
by AGelbert
209 Replies
3664 Views
Last post December 12, 2017, 02:40:24 pm
by AGelbert
83 Replies
2122 Views
Last post January 10, 2018, 05:35:00 pm
by AGelbert
31 Replies
3158 Views
Last post February 09, 2017, 07:20:24 pm
by AGelbert
130 Replies
3095 Views
Last post January 06, 2018, 02:45:04 pm
by AGelbert

+-Recent Topics

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
January 16, 2018, 07:10:37 pm

Fossil Fuel Propaganda Modus Operandi by AGelbert
January 16, 2018, 07:00:16 pm

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
January 16, 2018, 05:30:01 pm

Pollution by AGelbert
January 16, 2018, 04:49:55 pm

Money by AGelbert
January 16, 2018, 01:26:19 pm

The Big Picture of Renewable Energy Growth by AGelbert
January 16, 2018, 01:08:42 pm

Wind Power by AGelbert
January 15, 2018, 11:06:22 pm

Non-routine News by AGelbert
January 15, 2018, 10:01:37 pm

Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden by AGelbert
January 15, 2018, 09:06:27 pm

Member Interesting, Hair Raising, Humorous or Otherwise Unusual Experiences by AGelbert
January 15, 2018, 02:28:49 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial