+- +-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 51
Latest: JUST4TheFACTS
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 14019
Total Topics: 268
Most Online Today: 16
Most Online Ever: 137
(April 21, 2019, 04:54:01 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 7
Total: 7

Author Topic: Species Population Biomass effects on the Biosphere  (Read 528 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

AGelbert

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31023
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • Renwable Revolution
Re: Species Population Biomass effects on the Biosphere
« on: October 07, 2015, 12:04:54 am »
The predator survives – but the ecosystem crashes

Date:October 6, 2015  Source: Linköping Universitet


The killer whales' main prey used to be newborn whale calves. When whale populations fell dramatically due to intensive hunting, they began to hunt seal instead. Then when the seal population was quickly eradicated, the killer whales moved on to sea otters. This reduced the pressure on sea urchins, the preferred diet of the sea otters. As a result, the sea urchins grazed down the kelp beds that have served as nurseries for many different fish species and small marine animals.  :(

What do killer whales, polar bears and humans have in common?
They are adaptable predators with the ability to select new prey when their favourite food is in low supply. But this change can disrupt entire ecosystems.

"If the predator is efficient at killing its prey, such a change can lead to negative effects in the long term, for the entire food web, even if in the short term it benefits the predator's survival," says David Gilljam, doctoral student in theoretical biology, who joined with Professor Bo Ebenman and PhD Alva Curtsdotter to publish a new model-based study in Nature Communications.

By working with both natural and computer-generated food webs, the researchers can show how the overexploitation of resources caused by predators changing their prey can, in the worst case, lead to an extinction cascade, where species after species is wiped out in a domino effect.

A dramatic example of this is the killer whale, whose main prey was newborn whale calves. When whale populations fell dramatically due to intensive hunting, they began to hunt seal instead. Then when the seal population was quickly eradicated, the killer whales moved on to sea otters. This reduced the pressure on sea urchins, the preferred diet of the sea otters. As a result, the sea urchins grazed down the kelp beds that have served as nurseries for many different fish species and small marine animals.

"Think of a rope that's made of a number of twisted fibres. When force is applied to the rope, the force is spread across all the fibres. If one fibre breaks, the remaining fibres take all the force, with more force on each individual fibre. If more break, eventually the whole rope will fail," says Prof Ebenman.

A few examples from the real world:

•As the ice in the Arctic melts, it gets more and more difficult for the polar bears to hunt seal -- their natural prey. Instead they have started to venture onto the land, to feed on the eggs and young of ground-nesting birds, which are already the prey of other predators such as arctic foxes. The risk is that the predatory pressure on these birds will be too great.

•West-African fishermen are abandoning their fishing grounds in times of poor supply -- which is caused by industrial-scale fishing. Instead they are hunting on nature reserves, which leads to drastic reductions to the populations of prey animals there. Humans are an extremely flexible, efficient predator, who have massive impact on ecosystems.

The theoretical simulations presented by the LiU biologists completely contradict what we previously believed took place, when a predator loses its favourite prey.
Quote

"The belief was that an extinction cascade would be avoided if the predator is adaptable and can shift to another prey. Our new results indicate that the opposite can occur, and the consequences can be even worse. A change in prey is a double-edged sword -- in the short term it can help a flexible predator survive, but long term it can negatively affect the entire existence of the food web," says Prof Ebenman.

 Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Linköping Universitet. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
 

Journal Reference:
1.David Gilljam, Alva Curtsdotter, Bo Ebenman. Adaptive rewiring aggravates the effects of species loss in ecosystems. Nature Communications, 2015; 6: 8412 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9412
Hope deferred maketh the heart sick: but when the desire cometh, it is a tree of life. Pr. 13:12

 

+-Recent Topics

🌟 IMPEACHMENT SCORE 🌠 by Surly1
November 13, 2019, 06:12:12 am

Doomstead Diner Daily by Surly1
November 13, 2019, 06:09:45 am

🚩 Global Climate Chaos ☠️ by AGelbert
November 12, 2019, 10:35:17 pm

Healthy Eating by AGelbert
November 12, 2019, 09:14:59 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
November 11, 2019, 07:24:57 pm

End Times according to the Judeo Christian Bible by AGelbert
November 10, 2019, 03:58:20 pm

Corporate Fascist Corruption of Christianity by AGelbert
November 10, 2019, 03:37:06 pm

2020 Presidential Election by AGelbert
November 10, 2019, 02:11:58 pm

Mechanisms of Prejudice: Hidden and Not Hidden by AGelbert
November 09, 2019, 06:21:53 pm

Apocalyptic Humor by AGelbert
November 09, 2019, 04:12:33 pm