+- +-


Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Total Members: 42
Latest: eranda
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Total Posts: 9159
Total Topics: 233
Most Online Today: 1
Most Online Ever: 52
(November 29, 2017, 04:04:44 am)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: Miraculous Healing  (Read 72 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8964
  • Location: Colchester, Vermont
    • View Profile
    • Agelbert Truth AND Consequences
Miraculous Healing
« on: September 19, 2016, 01:34:15 pm »
Partial Cures in Later Medieval Canonization Processes

September 13, 2016 By Medievalists.net

Heavenly Healing or Failure of Faith?    ???  Partial Cures in Later Medieval Canonization Processes

By Jenni Kuuliala

Introduction: For the past decades, canonization processes and miracle collections have provided a treasure trove for the historians of everyday life. Using them as source material, topics such as family life, childhood, and gender roles have been covered by many scholars, in addition to the study of the veneration of saints and the canonization process itself. Healing miracles, with their basis in the Bible, were the fundamental type of miracle performed by saints.

For medieval people, the miracles performed by Christ provided the models for subsequent miracles, which continued to be conducted after his life on earth. A high proportion of recorded miracles cured blindness, deafness, speech disorders, and various conditions impairing a person’s mobility. Therefore, they also provide a very unique source type for the study of medieval illness and health, as well as dis/ability.

Although many of the healing miracles included in later medieval canonization records, as well as in other types of miracle collections, are sudden, often even showy cures, a large proportion of the recoveries of particularly physical impairments and long-term illnesses were gradual.

Additionally, hagiographic sources include a group of miracles that were somehow partial. By ‘partial cure’, I mean healing miracles, after which some milder symptoms of the previous illness or impairment remained. The term is a modern one; although the sources record the possible ‘incompleteness’ of the cure, there is variation in the labelling and phrasing of them. Cures that can be defined as partial were, in any case, scrutinized relatively rarely in the canonization hearings.

Those scholars who have paid attention to their existence have explained this lack of coverage by interpreting them as failed miracles, or uninteresting to the commissioners. For example, Maria Wittmer-Butsch and Constanze Rendtel write that partial cures were most often rejected because they were considered rather as healings, not miracles, and thus no longer interesting for the process, and Stanko Andrić places partial cures in the category of failed, or ‘not-quite-successful’ miracles.

Click here to read this article from Academia.edu

Leges         Sine    Moribus     Vanae   
if it has not works, is dead, being alone.


Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
Last post September 18, 2014, 01:53:13 am
by AGelbert

+-Recent Topics

Homebody Handy Hints by AGelbert
March 17, 2018, 06:42:21 pm

Fossil Fuel Skulldugggery by AGelbert
March 17, 2018, 06:20:08 pm

Corruption in Government by AGelbert
March 17, 2018, 05:20:43 pm

Global Warming is WITH US by AGelbert
March 17, 2018, 03:05:58 pm

Money by AGelbert
March 16, 2018, 09:47:49 pm

Corporate Profits over Patient in the Health Care Field by AGelbert
March 16, 2018, 08:20:24 pm

Pollution by AGelbert
March 16, 2018, 05:02:05 pm

Photvoltaics (PV) by AGelbert
March 16, 2018, 02:44:25 pm

Electric Vehicles by AGelbert
March 15, 2018, 08:56:44 pm

Non-routine News by AGelbert
March 15, 2018, 08:41:19 pm

Free Web Hit Counter By CSS HTML Tutorial